Just like in 2000, the Republican "bought and paid to spin" media helped hide and justify the short-comings of George W. Bush. They spun justifications that Bush supporters ate up and spewed back with venom at anyone that tried to challenge. Now,the flip side, liberal leaning media spinning and justifying anything and everything that comes out about Obama, and helping to downplay it in a way that has felt so unprofessional. What motivates the medias unprofessional and irresponsible bias (money, fear of looking racist, etc..)?
Asked by Anonymous at 2:16 AM on Nov. 4, 2008 in Politics & Current Events
Answer by Anonymous at 7:57 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by Anonymous at 2:21 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by Anonymous at 2:24 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by Anonymous at 2:49 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by MomsMuses03 at 3:29 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by MomsMuses03 at 3:34 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
OH MY GOD what media were YOU watching in 2000 and since. They have always talked about Bush like he was an idiot and incompetent. Then the celebs got involved. Bush is better educated than MANY of his detractors. They made fun of his problems with alcohol, I mean because so few people have that problem (dripping with sarcasm). He has not been that bad of a pres. Case and point...we haven't been attacked in 8 yrs. Our standing in the world isn't great. BECAUSE he did what it took to keep US safe! I think his numbers are so low for the same reason Obama's are so high and the economy is so bad. It's a self fulfilling prophecy. If you say something often enough people start to believe it.
Answer by momof030404 at 7:22 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by akinbottom2 at 7:38 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by rissa_doll at 7:54 AM on Nov. 4, 2008
Answer by Anonymous at 8:01 AM on Nov. 4, 2008