Why are there over 550 footnotes stamped "non-public: and "for internal use only" in the draft document for net neutrality?
Answer by NotPanicking at 1:17 PM on Dec. 5, 2010
Answer by lovinangels at 12:55 PM on Dec. 5, 2010
Answer by jesse123456 at 11:46 AM on Dec. 5, 2010
Welll....Wikileaks will take care of outing those government secrets,right? Obviously anything marked as Non-public or for internal use have to be government sites and you wouldn't want them to be revealed. I mean---secrets exposed can undermine our country....That's what everyone is saying . Answer by kerp1960
Seriously? So you think that our federal government should just pass laws and then keep the content of those laws from us to prevent Wikileaks from obtaining information on said law? Should we take all speed limit signs down so we can all just guess at what the speed limit is and then law enforcement can give citations at their own discretion since we can't verify what the law actually says? Did you even think about that before you typed it out?
Answer by QuinnMae at 7:13 PM on Dec. 5, 2010
Answer by Sheraymonet at 3:41 PM on Dec. 5, 2010
Answer by -Eilish- at 4:22 PM on Dec. 5, 2010
Answer by san78 at 5:36 PM on Dec. 5, 2010
If you read her typical replies, you would find she doesn't think before or after. Comment by Carpy
LOL! I know what you mean. I am quite familiar with her inconsistencies, but this answer struck me as so asinine I couldn't leave the question without commenting on it. I mean, how in the world does it make sense to keep the rule of law from the citizens, however hold those same citizens to the letter of these 'private' laws. It's just so ridiculous. It defies logic.
Answer by QuinnMae at 9:41 PM on Dec. 5, 2010
Answer by soyousay at 11:29 AM on Dec. 5, 2010