there's a bit more to it than that:
Pancol's order included other evidence presented in court. It said there was evidence that Scarberry had used profanity in front of the children and at times "failed to control or manage his anger. ... In addition, (Scarberry) was sending a great number of text messages to (Porcaro)."
The order does not say that Scarberry was abusive or negligent toward the children.
Earlier, Percaro had obtained a protective order against Scarberry, which he objected to. She alleged that Scarberry "attempts to harrass and intimidate me at my place of employment with abusive language and profanity" and accused him of "randomly and unexpectedly stopping by my house at different hours of the day and night."
A protective order against Scarberry was issued in April, and Scarberry said evidence was presented later in court to refute the allegations. A month later, both parties renewed an agreement that extended joint custody.
http:/ / scienceblogs. com/dispatches/2010/11/losing_custody_due_to_agnostic.php
Does THAT sound like a "loving father"???
Answer by sahmamax2 at 2:29 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by anime_mom619 at 4:35 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by sahmamax2 at 4:43 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by anime_mom619 at 5:17 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by sahmamax2 at 5:52 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 3:35 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by KristiS11384 at 3:39 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by 2tinyhineys at 4:13 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by sahmamax2 at 4:23 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Answer by sahmamax2 at 4:36 PM on Dec. 6, 2010
Next question overall
I am trying really hard to think of the name of this cartoon.