U.S. agencies have warned some employees that reading the classified State Department documents released by WikiLeaks puts them at risk of losing their jobs. But what about students considering jobs with the federal government? Do they jeopardize their chances by reading WikiLeaks?
It's a gray area, said law professors and national security experts who spoke with CNN. The topic has been debated intensely in the past week in legal and academic circles, ever since several U.S. universities sent e-mails to students with warnings about reading leaked documents.
They say students ought to be mindful of their future careers when commenting on or distributing the documents online -- especially those planning to seek jobs in national security or the intelligence community, which require a security clearance.
"The security clearance asks whether or not you're a risk when it comes to sensitive material. This could be one indicator that, when taken together with others, creates a broader pattern that might suggest you're not a person to be hired," said Pepperdine University law professor Gregory McNeal, who specializes in national security law.
"They may very well take into account your opinion, as a job candidate, whether or not you think WikiLeaks is a good thing or bad thing for the country," he said. "It's a small issue, but one to approach with caution if I were a student seeking a job in the national security field."
E-mails went out last week to students at several schools, including Boston University's School of Law, Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service and Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, cautioning students against commenting on or posting links to the documents on social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter.
Answer by BlueCollarMama at 7:46 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Answer by Jenny-talia at 7:52 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Answer by lovinangels at 7:58 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Answer by itsmesteph11 at 7:58 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Answer by Jenny-talia at 7:59 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Answer by BlueCollarMama at 8:11 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Answer by Carpy at 8:12 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Grly since an Army PFC working as in Intel analyst was involved I'm inclined to agree.
Answer by BlueCollarMama at 8:31 PM on Dec. 8, 2010
Answer by agentwanda at 9:54 PM on Dec. 8, 2010