Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

5 Bumps

Obama's Foreclosure Program is a Failure. I'm shocked, aren't you?

U.S. Foreclosure Prevention Falls Short, Watchdog Panel Finds

A U.S. Treasury program aimed at preventing 3 million foreclosures is likely to fulfill less than a third of its goal, a congressional watchdog reported.

The Treasury’s homeowner aid effort is “ineffective” and has failed to hold mortgage companies accountable, the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program said in a report released today.

“The program has turned out to be a lot smaller and have a lot less impact on the housing market than we expected,” said former U.S. Senator Ted Kaufman, the chairman of the panel.

The Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, pays lenders and servicers to rewrite loan terms for borrowers who can’t make their current mortgage payments. Since its 2008 creation, HAMP’s goal of preventing 3 million to 4 million foreclosures “has been repeatedly redefined and watered down,” the panel said.

“If current trends hold, HAMP will prevent only 700,000 to 800,000 foreclosures,” a small portion of the 8 million to 13 million foreclosures expected by 2012, said Kaufman, a Democrat from Delaware.

The Treasury will spend only about a fourth of the $50 billion it allocated for the program in 2009, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

“For this reason, Treasury’s reluctance to acknowledge HAMP’s shortcomings has had real consequences,” the TARP panel found. “Absent a dramatic and unexpected increase in HAMP enrollment, many billions of dollars set aside for foreclosure mitigation may well be left unused. As a result, an untold number of borrowers may go without help.”

Dropouts

Homeowners are dropping out of the program at a faster rate than they’re joining it, the Treasury reported last month. The number of borrowers aided by HAMP grew to nearly 520,000 in October, up 23,750 from a month earlier, while 36,300 dropped out after failing to make their modified payments.

Timothy Massad, Treasury’s acting assistant secretary for financial stability, called the report “somewhat unfair.”

Massad said that while 500,000 homeowners have received permanent loan modifications under HAMP, the impact goes beyond those numbers because mortgage servicers have imitated HAMP with their own programs.

“We’ve set a new standard for the industry,” Massad told reporters in a conference call. When “ millions of modifications” by the industry are taken into account, “it is having a real impact on the ground,” he said.

HAMP’s premise is that lenders have an incentive to reduce a borrower’s payments to prevent a foreclosure because they usually recover only a fraction of the value of a mortgage when they seize a home.

Sweetener

Through HAMP, “Treasury attempted to sweeten this deal by offering incentive payments to all parties to a mortgage loan modification,” the panel reported. “Yet despite the apparent strength of HAMP’s economic logic, the program has failed to help the vast majority of homeowners facing foreclosure.”

Companies that manage mortgage loans can profit from foreclosure-related fees and are reluctant to participate in the Treasury program, the report found. In addition, many borrowers have second mortgages from lenders who might profit by blocking a loan modification. Pooling and servicing agreements that govern securitized mortgages might also limit servicers’ ability to modify loans.

“Mortgages are, in practice, far more complicated than a one-to-one relationship between borrower and lender,” the panel found.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2010-12-14/u-s-foreclosure-prevention-program-to-fall-short-watchdog-panel-finds.html

Answer Question
 
NotPanicking

Asked by NotPanicking at 12:22 PM on Dec. 14, 2010 in Politics & Current Events

Level 51 (421,172 Credits)
Answers (20)
  • Yeah, but no more shocked than his other failures, they just keep piling up.
    SweetLuci

    Answer by SweetLuci at 12:24 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • Gee willikers, bob, really? I never saw that one coming!
    lovinangels

    Answer by lovinangels at 12:26 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • We got denied the HAMP program when we went from making over 80k a year, to my husband losing his job, and living off of 3,500 a month! We haven't given up hope yet, we're going to re-apply in Feb, but still, it sucks!
    gumby11883

    Answer by gumby11883 at 12:27 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • I hate to say this, but I don't think this was necessarily all Obama's plan's fault. The plan was faulty in several areas, but the bottom line was that the financial institutions didn't have to participate, and there were a lot of homeowners that never should have had a mortgage to begin with. I have to place most of the blame on the banks, they are the ones who created this mess when they were handing out sub-prime mortgages like they were ice cream cones. People were over-paying for homes, it drove the market up artificially, and everyone is paying for it now.

    Additionally, many homeowners didn't meet the criteria for the HAMP program, and the media was using the total foreclosure number, not the number of homeowners that actually could have participated. Not using the correct numbers really skewed the results.
    Scuba

    Answer by Scuba at 12:28 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • Obama and Failure.... There seems to be a trend..... hrmmm...
    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:31 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • No suprise here, what does suprise me is that these progressives implement failure after failure yet some STILL follow blindly.
    Carpy

    Answer by Carpy at 12:37 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • what does suprise me is that these progressives implement failure after failure yet some STILL follow blindly.


    Not only do they FOLLOW... They actually defend him and his failures.....

    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:45 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • :gasssssp: Nexxxxxt....another failure surely soon to come!
    tnmomofive

    Answer by tnmomofive at 1:00 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • It wasn't a failure for me. We were able to modify our mortage and I am very thankful.
    UpSheRises

    Answer by UpSheRises at 2:01 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

  • Not the least bit surprised.
    tiddliwinks

    Answer by tiddliwinks at 2:04 PM on Dec. 14, 2010

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.
close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN