I have noticed something rather interesting.
In one section, the answers run along the lines of "Give your husband sex, no matter how you feel b/c if you don't someone else will."
While in another section, the answers (many by the same women) run along the lines of "Hubby is a big boy and can take care of himself, the kids come first, NO MATTER WHAT."
That "no matter what" is what brought on this observation. You obviously cannot be giving hubby the sex he "demands" if you are putting your kids' needs first.
So ladies, which is it?
Which is it?
It's neither. In fact, believing in either premise is ridiculous and unrealistic.
According to Premise A (always give sex or he'll find it somewhere else) I'm SOL because I've been put on pelvic rest for the duration of this pregnancy. Doing it anyway would put both me and the baby at risk. So, according to Premise A, my husband has every right to go find himself a replacement vagina at this point. I think y'all can see that Premise A is pretty stupid.
According to Premise B (kids come first no matter what) I'm SOL because I'm not allowed to bend over, lift anything over 10 pounds or stand for more than 30 minutes at a time. So, according to Premise B, my kids should come first NO MATTER WHAT, and I should be totin' that bale and haulin' that barge anyway and risk death. I guess y'all can see that Premise B is pretty stupid too.
Answer by Fistandantalus at 8:31 AM on Dec. 28, 2010
Answer by musicpisces at 8:56 PM on Dec. 27, 2010
Answer by angevil53 at 8:57 PM on Dec. 27, 2010
Answer by mommy_of_two388 at 8:55 PM on Dec. 27, 2010
Answer by SpaceToast at 9:09 PM on Dec. 27, 2010
Answer by pixie_trix at 9:12 PM on Dec. 27, 2010
Answer by mrssundin at 9:18 PM on Dec. 27, 2010
Answer by _Tam_ at 2:07 AM on Dec. 28, 2010
Answer by DansBabe at 10:11 PM on Dec. 27, 2010
Answer by Ricanmami1 at 10:30 PM on Dec. 27, 2010