Trying to understand how they will cover my child who is 5 but not me and my unborn child. How does that make any sense. I've called and am waiting to hear back but is it likely this was just an oversight and the stupid guy missed that I was pregnant and that was the reason I was filing. How can they be different standards? The baby costs a hell of a lot more than the child so how do they figure we can't afford her but we can the baby?
Asked by Anonymous at 4:58 PM on Dec. 30, 2010 in General Parenting
Answer by JLS2388 at 7:30 PM on Dec. 30, 2010
Answer by frogdawg at 5:20 PM on Dec. 30, 2010
Answer by tyfry7496 at 8:26 PM on Dec. 30, 2010