How do you feel about wikileaks vindicating George bush
WikiLeaks'-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction (emphasis added). ... Chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam's toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents."
Answer by yourspecialkid at 11:57 PM on Jan. 8, 2011
Answer by NotPanicking at 1:06 AM on Jan. 9, 2011
Answer by LoriKeet at 8:13 PM on Jan. 8, 2011
Answer by LoriKeet at 8:42 AM on Jan. 9, 2011
Answer by soyousay at 10:00 PM on Jan. 8, 2011
It is easy to see that you never read Gorge Bush's book. Bush never said or wrote such a thing.
Would sure like to know were you get some of the crazy things you say.
Answer by Natesmom507 at 8:20 AM on Jan. 9, 2011
It wouldn't matter if Hussein himself came back from the grave and said that GWB was right. They had the ability, the chemicals, and the desire to use them. The PBO/Pelosi/Reid-blame Bush choir will still speak their talking points. It doesn't matter what the truth is. It only matters that they stay the course. I have always believed that Hussein rushed the majority of the weapons out of the country as he tried to do with his air force during the 1st Gulf War.
Answer by jesse123456 at 8:58 AM on Jan. 9, 2011
Answer by brandyj at 8:24 PM on Jan. 8, 2011
Answer by agentwanda at 8:55 PM on Jan. 8, 2011
Answer by SweetLuci at 8:45 AM on Jan. 9, 2011
Next question overall
my dr. told me i have a miscarrige but i don't have any signs. Why?