Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

2 Bumps

Why are "pants" plural?

I know it's silly but it struck earlier. You put on a shirt and a pair of pants. It's one garment what makes it a pair?

Answer Question

Asked by sopranomommy at 2:46 PM on Jan. 30, 2011 in Just for Fun

Level 25 (24,492 Credits)
Answers (6)
  • *struck me earlier

    Comment by sopranomommy (original poster) at 2:47 PM on Jan. 30, 2011

  • I guess because there are two pant legs on a pair of pants.

    Answer by Anonymous at 2:51 PM on Jan. 30, 2011

  • Because there are two Pant legs, not one. Just like a pair of shoes.

    Answer by Musicmom80 at 2:54 PM on Jan. 30, 2011

  • I found this online.. I am same anonymous as above

    According to several costume historians who have helped me with this reply, the answer to all this conventional plurality is very simple. Before the days of modern tailoring, such garments, whether underwear or outerwear, were indeed made in two parts, one for each leg. The pieces were put on each leg separately and then wrapped and tied or belted at the waist (just like cowboys’ chaps). The plural usage persisted out of habit even after the garments had become physically one piece. However, a shirt was a single piece of cloth, so it was always singular

    Answer by Anonymous at 2:57 PM on Jan. 30, 2011

  • You have two legs.. One pant for each leg?

    Answer by JazzlikeMraz at 3:08 PM on Jan. 30, 2011

  • They used to be literally two pieces that were tied together then untied as needed.

    Answer by SweetLuci at 6:46 PM on Jan. 30, 2011

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.