1. A person who refuses to change themself
2. How society has changed people
3. People who refuse to change with society
Answer by nbwindchime at 8:35 AM on Mar. 10, 2011
Answer by Nonoluna at 7:49 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
Answer by tnm786 at 7:50 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
None of the above really bother me, at least not without context. Why would a person need to change him/herself? If by "change" you mean improve--acknowledge weaknesses and work to improve on those weaknesses that hinder work or relationships--then it would bother me if a person refuses to make those sorts of changes. Society, by its very nature, has always changed people, for better or for worse. When charismatic people (like Hitler) affect the what people are willing to do within a society, it bothers me. People who refuse to live within the generally accepted rules of a society don't generally bother me, unless they expect to reap the benefits of that society without participating in it. But. . . these are generalizations, and I can't really make or stick to sweeping statements without particulars.
Answer by jsbenkert at 8:05 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
I would say #2 - but I would be more apt to put "how society expects people to change to become one of the masses"
Answer by scout_mom at 9:09 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
Answer by SabrinaMBowen at 9:19 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
Answer by familynsni at 10:17 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
Answer by SpiritedWitch at 10:33 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
Answer by Brylee.Walker at 7:59 AM on Mar. 9, 2011
Answer by gemgem at 8:02 AM on Mar. 9, 2011