Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Whose second labour was longer than their first?


Asked by Twinminator at 2:16 PM on Mar. 10, 2011 in General Parenting

Level 11 (553 Credits)
This question is closed.
Answers (5)
  • Mine was .. First child I went into labor at 6:30 that morning and had her at 8:55 that same morning.. With the second, went into labor at 10:30 that morning and had her at 12:45 that afternoon. So yeah, the second was longer than the first but not by much. I wasn't in labor 10 hours total will all 3 of my kids.

    Answer by midnightmoma at 2:32 PM on Mar. 10, 2011

  • not mine. My oldest was a 4 and a half hr labor and my second was a 2hr labor. I know they were fast and women probably hate it but sorry to start any drama

    Answer by at 2:18 PM on Mar. 10, 2011

  • Not at all, no need to worry, my first labour was even faster, that's why I'm worrying! :o)
    A slightly longer or similar length one would give me time to sort out the kids first, don't want to be giving birth on the bathroom floor!

    Comment by Twinminator (original poster) at 2:21 PM on Mar. 10, 2011

  • Mine was by more than 12 hours.

    Answer by scout_mom at 2:21 PM on Mar. 10, 2011

  • Mine was.

    Answer by Krysta622 at 3:49 PM on Mar. 10, 2011