I am a photographer and have been going back and forth on this topic. I do take picture nake babies as art but never once show their privates, only butt. All pictures are in no way sexual or posed in a sexual way either. But I have heard of some people taking it over board. I can understand both sides...yes there are sick, gross, nasty people in this world that would look a child in a sexual way and could take that picture and use it. But at the same time, they are amazingly cute, sweet pictures. No mom has asked me not to post them even after I asked two times to be sure. So I am just wondering, is it legal and what do yall think?Answer Question
Asked by Anonymous at 12:30 AM on Mar. 15, 2011 in Parenting Debate
I think it's too risky. It gets my blood boiling to think of some pervert using my childs beautiful pictures like that as "porn". BUT, on the other hand, they can do that with ANY picture of a child, the child doesn't have to be naked. I have a private website that our family and close friends can go to and that's where all of our family pictures are. No one can google it and find us. I wouldn't allow the pictures to be anywhere else. My 1 year old has cellulite on her booty. I got snap happy and took a few pictures of her booty. No, I won't post those ANYWHERE.
Answer by MrsHouston47302 at 12:34 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by bethany49 at 12:40 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by Autumn07 at 12:42 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by Charis76 at 1:21 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by admckenzie at 1:35 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by May-20 at 7:26 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by meooma at 9:54 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by Mom2Just1Kiddo at 10:06 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by JoLee12345 at 10:21 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Answer by boobarandbell at 10:34 AM on Mar. 15, 2011
Next question overall
My daughter is turning sixteen and I want to know what other mothers held as...
Active Posts in All Groups