Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

3 Bumps

Anti-Union law in WI temporarily blocked by judge, thoughts?

MADISON, Wis. — A Wisconsin judge has issued a temporary restraining order blocking the state's new and contentious collective bargaining law from taking effect.

Dane County Judge Maryann Sumi (SOO'-mee) issued the order Friday to temporarily block the law as District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, a Democrat, had requested.

Ozanne filed a lawsuit contending that a legislative committee that broke a stalemate that had kept the law in limbo for weeks met without the 24-hour notice required by Wisconsin's open meetings law. The Republican-controlled Legislature passed the measure and Gov. Scott Walker signed it last week.

A spokesman for Republican Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald declined to comment, citing the legal fight. Messages left for comment with Walker's spokesmen, as well as Democratic legislative leaders, were not immediately returned.

Answer Question
 
sweet-a-kins

Asked by sweet-a-kins at 12:07 PM on Mar. 18, 2011 in Politics & Current Events

Level 34 (67,502 Credits)
Answers (40)
  • THANK GOD!! Especially seeing the vote was ILLEGAL to begin with.
    tyfry7496

    Answer by tyfry7496 at 12:09 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • The vote violated the state’s open-meetings law by failing to give 24-hours’ notice, Barca said in a complaint filed in Madison, the state capital. LOL..


    So, it goes to the WI Supreme Court?  Thoughts?  It's going to court... I wouldn't be "thanking God"  just yet... lol....   It's not like it's a done deal... It's an ongoing piece of legislation....  I'm not surprised there is a "legal argument" to stall....  It will get sorted out....   Even If the way in which the bill became law is found unconstitutional?  It will most likely be reintroduced~will the Democratic Cowards run for Illinois again and avoid doing their job? 

    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:20 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • So, it goes to the WI Supreme Court?  Thoughts?  It's going to court... I wouldn't be "thanking God"  just yet...


    Who did?

    sweet-a-kins

    Comment by sweet-a-kins (original poster) at 12:22 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • grlygirlsz--those Dems that fled to Illinois were doing their jobs--they were doing their jobs in another location, by teleconference, phones calls, emails, etc. Those Dems taught or teens to get interested in politics, to fight for what is right. to get out and VOTE. Teens that weren't interested in politics are now interested. ILLEGAL political ploys were brought out into the open and more and more are coming out every day. The Dems didn't stand by and let the citizens of Wisconsin get railroaded by the Governor...the governor that is losing in popularity every day.
    tyfry7496

    Answer by tyfry7496 at 12:25 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • -those Dems that fled to Illinois were doing their jobs--they were doing their jobs in another location, by teleconference, phones calls, emails, etc


    They avoided doing the people's work and voting on bills... All because they were in the minority. They threw the politicians equivalent of a tamper tantrum.

    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:36 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • Who did?


    Look at the first answer on your question... Wow... Just Wow... Try and Follow along on your own thread.. LOL  And we are only on page one...

    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:37 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • *temper*
    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:37 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • LOL! A weak and expected attempt. If the 24 hr rule is all they have it is a done deal except for the bawling about it.
    yourspecialkid

    Answer by yourspecialkid at 12:48 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  • I think its fine regardless its going to happen regardless they must have needed more time to push some contracts through.


    I also think they should pass this....


    A constitutional amendment proposed by Democratic Sen. Tim Cullen drops the three-fifths requirement so the Senate would only need a simple majority to vote.


    http://www.fox47.com/newsroom/top_stories/videos/vid_1533.shtml


    That way even if they flee again they can just go back and vote on it again.

    Charis76

    Answer by Charis76 at 12:50 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

  •  


    Who did?




    Look at the first answer on your question... Wow... Just Wow... Try and Follow along on your own thread.. LOL  And we are only on page one...


    Look how fast it took YOU to get ignorant, i didnt see HER comment until after I posted...but thanks for being consistant



    sweet-a-kins

    Comment by sweet-a-kins (original poster) at 12:51 PM on Mar. 18, 2011

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.
close Cafemom Join now to connect to other members! Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN