Given that terrorism is an ideology. An almost abstract entity. How can killing civilians in these countries do anything but exacerbate this situation?
Wouldn't a more effective approach be to bring these leaders to justice? Show that we can break these groups up? You can't show how not to be a terrorist by killing and further marginalizing the poor and helpless of a country at risk.
I realize that this is a day late and a dollar short, but it appears to me that we just aren't learning the lessons we need to with this issue.
Answer by Anonymous at 7:43 PM on Mar. 30, 2011
Answer by ILovemyPaulie at 7:50 PM on Mar. 30, 2011
Answer by LoriKeet at 8:31 PM on Mar. 30, 2011
Answer by LoriKeet at 9:08 PM on Mar. 30, 2011
Control vs procurement of natural resources= 6 or one half dozen of the other...They have it, we use more than any other nation and obviously have a need. They need top dollar for this resource and we need to get it for the least amount possible. A power struggle over a commodity that we must have to fuel our economy-
Answer by Sisteract at 10:09 PM on Mar. 30, 2011
Answer by yourspecialkid at 10:15 PM on Mar. 30, 2011
I am for a bold and no nonsense approach...a couple of glass parking lots in the right locations would work miracles. But, alas that is considered horrible..and perhaps even uncivilized.
And so are the terrorists, and that's the problem. I refuse to become them-
Answer by Sisteract at 11:45 PM on Mar. 30, 2011