Are the similar? Daly uses Focus on the Family as a political platform. Dawkins uses his standing in academia for the same thing. Neither seem content in their beliefs. Each seem to need to take away from the other side to prove their point.
What do you think?
Asked by Anonymous at 8:36 AM on Apr. 7, 2011 in Religious Debate
Answer by adnilm at 12:05 PM on Apr. 7, 2011
I don't see what putting down the other side has to do with being content in their beliefs. If someone finds fault with what others believe and sits by and says and does nothing, then they are allowing the world to be filled with what they consider negativity and lies. Why not speak up, stress your opinions and point out the fallacies of the other side? People are so hung up on tolerance...
Answer by IhartU at 8:47 AM on Apr. 7, 2011
Answer by KelleyP77 at 2:30 PM on Apr. 7, 2011
Answer by jujubean1979200 at 8:40 AM on Apr. 7, 2011
Answer by popzaroo at 10:41 AM on Apr. 7, 2011
Thanks, Kelley! I was scratching my head, trying to figure out what those two men had in common, and couldn't come up with anything. I can see now that it's because they really have nothing in common.
Answer by jsbenkert at 4:02 PM on Apr. 7, 2011