Asked by Anonymous at 8:53 PM on May. 3, 2011 in Religious Debate
Answer by KristiS11384 at 9:11 PM on May. 3, 2011
Answer by ObbyDobbie at 9:24 PM on May. 3, 2011
Answer by m-avi at 8:59 PM on May. 3, 2011
Answer by JulieJacobKyle at 9:39 PM on May. 3, 2011
First of all, we all know that bin Laden lived. We also have proof that he died--in the way of contemporary eye-witness accounts (we don't have to wait for a hundred years to get a written account of this). We also have DNA evidence and photographs. Bin Laden hasn't claimed to be the Son of God, and we don't expect him to rise from the dead three days after his death.
We have no contemporary accounts of Jesus' life or death. We have no evidence (other than what's written in the Bible) of his existence. We have no DNA evidence. We have conflicting stories about his life, his death and his supposed resurrection. There are some pretty fantastic claims that he rose from the dead. . . there are no similarities between bin Laden and the stories of Jesus.
Where's the "touché", exactly?
Answer by jsbenkert at 10:30 PM on May. 3, 2011
Answer by anime_mom619 at 9:22 PM on May. 3, 2011
Answer by NotPanicking at 11:16 PM on May. 3, 2011
Answer by Crafty26 at 10:17 PM on May. 3, 2011
Answer by ObbyDobbie at 9:31 PM on May. 3, 2011