In fact, just the opposite. I think Panetta would know don't you?
For you who insist otherwise
Answer by mompam at 12:20 PM on May. 4, 2011
Answer by Anonymous at 12:20 PM on May. 4, 2011
Answer by vbruno at 12:21 PM on May. 4, 2011
Answer by EJKZ at 12:21 PM on May. 4, 2011
I thought someone posted it as FACT that it wasn't used just a little while ago. Interesting.
I don't know if it was used and I don't care if it was used. We have used it while training our own soldiers and I am not against it's use.
Answer by QuinnMae at 12:22 PM on May. 4, 2011
I agree with we will never know. When it comes to the government saying something do you seriously believe what they say?
Answer by amazinggrace83 at 12:26 PM on May. 4, 2011
Op, we don't know. Multiple sources have given us information that harsh interrogation played a part in overall mission. More questions than definite answers... However, SOME, choose only to read/believe news articles that specifically align with their views/agenda.. They refuse to even discuss the other information out there... Well, their idea of "discussing" is to call people liars, and tell them they are wrong for posting the CIA head's responses...... Isn't the phrase for that~ narrow minded?
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:26 PM on May. 4, 2011
Answer by Anonymous at 12:27 PM on May. 4, 2011
Sorry, that should have read that it wasn't *useful*.
Answer by QuinnMae at 12:34 PM on May. 4, 2011
Answer by Imogine at 12:43 PM on May. 4, 2011