Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

5 Bumps

Fannie Mae only wants %8.5 billion of taxpayer money. Should we give it to them?

When do we say enough is enough?

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Mortgage finance giant Fannie Mae on Friday said it would ask for an additional $8.5 billion from taxpayers as it continues to suffer losses on loans made prior to 2009.

The largest U.S. residential mortgage funds provider reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $8.7 billion, or $1.52 per diluted share, in the first quarter.

Including the latest request, the firm has taken about $100 billion from the U.S. government since it was seized in 2008, though it has also paid about $12.4 billion to taxpayers in interest.

Loans made in the past two years have been more profitable than loans made during the housing boom in preceding years.

"As we move forward, we are building a strong new book of business that now accounts for 45 percent of the company's overall single-family guaranty book of business," said Michael Williams, the firm's president and chief executive officer.

Sibling firm Freddie Mac said on Wednesday it lost just under a billion dollars in the first three months of the year, though the second-largest provider of mortgage funds did not request any new money from the government.

The two firms together have asked for about $164 billion, though their net payments have been reduced to about $140 billion as a result of the interest payments, including the latest request.

Then-U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson took control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae at the height of the financial crisis in September 2008 as losses mounted from mortgages gone bad.

The plan to put them into conservatorship was meant to be temporary, although it is likely to be years before a long-term replacement structure takes shape.

The two firms and the Federal Housing Administration back close to nine of 10 new home loans after private mortgage funding dried up in the wake of the financial crisis.

Answer Question
 
Carpy

Asked by Carpy at 8:49 PM on May. 6, 2011 in Politics & Current Events

Level 39 (114,053 Credits)
Answers (13)
  • Not just No, but HELL NO!
    QuinnMae

    Answer by QuinnMae at 8:51 PM on May. 6, 2011

  • For Cripes sakes NOOOOOOOOOO
    tnmomofive

    Answer by tnmomofive at 8:52 PM on May. 6, 2011

  • No! We should have never given any private company tax payer money. If your business can't profit, it goes belly up, the government doesn't need to bail it out.
    scout_mom

    Answer by scout_mom at 9:13 PM on May. 6, 2011

  • That would be a no from me as well.

    yourspecialkid

    Answer by yourspecialkid at 9:17 PM on May. 6, 2011

  • Is that all they want? (sarcasm)
    Izsarejman

    Answer by Izsarejman at 9:21 PM on May. 6, 2011

  • No.
    Natesmom507

    Answer by Natesmom507 at 9:31 PM on May. 6, 2011

  • What the hell! Hell no!!!! I'm so tired of the taxpayers bailing out these large corporations! It's called accountability! Bail me out and millions of others that are struggling to make ends meet!
    Kathy675

    Answer by Kathy675 at 10:33 PM on May. 6, 2011

  • The thievery that is taking place, makes me want to just barf~~~
    agentwanda

    Answer by agentwanda at 12:57 AM on May. 7, 2011

  • Absolutely not!!!!!

    skittles1108

    Answer by skittles1108 at 8:56 AM on May. 7, 2011

  • No, no, AND NO! If I wasn't clear, NNNNNNNOOOOOOOO!
    jesse123456

    Answer by jesse123456 at 6:20 PM on May. 7, 2011

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.
close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN