When Storm was born, the couple sent an email to friends and family: “We've decided not to share Storm's sex for now — a tribute to freedom and choice in place of limitation, a stand up to what the world could become in Storm's lifetime (a more progressive place? ...).”
Their announcement was met with stony silence. Then the deluge of criticisms began. Not just about Storm, but about how they were parenting their other two children.
The grandparents were supportive, but resented explaining the gender-free baby to friends and co-workers. They worried the children would be ridiculed. Friends said they were imposing their political and ideological values on a newborn. Most of all, people said they were setting their kids up for a life of bullying in a world that can be cruel to outsiders.
Witterick and Stocker believe they are giving their children the freedom to choose who they want to be, unconstrained by social norms about males and females. Some say their choice is alienating.
Full story here:Answer Question
Answer by sophistcatdfury at 9:30 PM on May. 21, 2011
Answer by m-avi at 9:30 PM on May. 21, 2011
Answer by greenbeanmoma at 9:30 PM on May. 21, 2011
Answer by SeasideNative at 9:32 PM on May. 21, 2011
Answer by SeasideNative at 9:33 PM on May. 21, 2011
Answer by DusterMommy at 9:42 PM on May. 21, 2011
Answer by DusterMommy at 9:44 PM on May. 21, 2011
Answer by pinkdragon36 at 9:53 PM on May. 21, 2011