For the past two days of the trial the jury has been watching visitation that was recorded by the jail that clearly shows how she lied, and how odds are she is making up the story of being molested. In essence these video tapes are her testifying because the jury is getting to hear her in her own words "explain" and lie and hurt her own family with her lies. They are hearing her lead investigators down the wrong path. They are listening to her say Caylee will be home soon. They are hearing her name suspects and people her parents should not trust and could be involved.
Because of this do you think she will HAVE to testify to try and explain why she lied and did what she did on video? I think her only chance to explain herself would force her to have to testify. What do you think?
Answer by Mom-2-3-Girlz at 10:24 AM on Jun. 3, 2011
Answer by older at 10:01 AM on Jun. 3, 2011
Answer by BlueCollarMama at 10:17 AM on Jun. 3, 2011
Answer by Sisteract at 10:28 AM on Jun. 3, 2011
Answer by yourspecialkid at 10:38 AM on Jun. 3, 2011
Answer by Musicmom80 at 10:19 AM on Jun. 3, 2011
Answer by Musicmom80 at 10:25 AM on Jun. 3, 2011
I wouldn't bother (I know it's her choice). She has already been proven a liar, if not a very adept pathological liar. Why would the jury have any reason to believe her testimony on the stand? Because she 'says' it's the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Yeah. Why bother.
Answer by QuinnMae at 1:07 PM on Jun. 3, 2011