Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

4 Bumps

Should she be prosecuted?

AMSTERDAM - A murder mystery has been solved - 65 years later - with the confession of a 96-year-old woman.

The 1946 killing of Felix Gulje, the head of a construction company who at the time was being considered for a high political post, roiled the Netherlands, and the failure to find the assassin became a point of contention among political parties.

On Wednesday, the mayor of Leiden, Henri Lenferink, said a woman has confessed to the killing, saying it happened in the mistaken belief that Gulje had collaborated with the Nazis.

Lenferink said he received a letter from the woman, whom he identified as Atie Ridder-Visser, on Jan. 1. Two subsequent interviews with her and a review of the historical archives persuaded him that her story was true.

On the cold sleeting night of March 1, 1946, Atie Visser rang Gulje's doorbell in Leiden, and told his wife that she had a letter to give to her husband. When he came to the door she shot him in the chest. He died in the ambulance, the mayor said, reading a lengthy statement at a news conference.

Visser had been a member of the resistance during the 1940-1945 Nazi occupation. Rumors had been circulating that Gulje was working with the occupation authorities, and he had been targeted in the underground press. His company did regular business with the Germans, and several employees belonged to a pro-Nazi organization.

He was arrested after the war, but acquitted.

After his death it emerged that Gulje had sheltered some Jews and had given money to help hide others with other families. A banned Catholic association also held secret meetings in his home, Lenferink said.

Visser moved to Indonesia after the war, where she met and married Herman Ridder. Childless, they moved back to the Netherlands several years later, also spending a few years in Spain.

Lenferink said police never suspected the woman in the killing.

After disclosing her role, Ridder-Visser met two grandchildren of her victim last month to explain what happened and why she did it, the mayor said. He did not disclose details of that conversation.

Ridder-Visser will not be prosecuted, he said. Although the 18-year statute of limitations was lifted for serious crimes in 2006, prosecutors ruled that the change in law would not apply in this case.

"Even now, after 65 years, the murder should be strongly condemned," Lenferink said. "It is a case of vigilantism, and is unacceptable."

But he appealed to reporters to leave her alone. "Mrs. Ridder-Visser is a very old, very frail woman who hears poorly, is disabled and needs help," he said.

Answer Question

Asked by sweet-a-kins at 2:44 PM on Jun. 8, 2011 in Politics & Current Events

Level 34 (67,502 Credits)
Answers (12)
  • She will die before it ever gets to court, why spend the money?

    Answer by meooma at 2:47 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • I don't think so. There is no reason to put her in jail...i'm fairly confident that she isn't a danger to society and i don't believe in punitive consequences.

    Answer by UpSheRises at 2:47 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • I think she should be....although she did it for the right reason she still killed someone.

    Answer by Shelii at 2:53 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • No she shouldn't because of the reasons stated above. I think it takes courage, even at her age, to come clean about such a horrible thing. I'm glad she told the truth and there is now closure for everyone involved.


    Answer by amazinggrace83 at 2:54 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • I think she should.. She killed someone.. it doesn't matter how long ago or how old she is now. It is still a crime.

    Answer by SuperrMommyy at 2:56 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • I think some of the PP are failing to see WHY she did it. I am not discounting what she did, but we can't possibly understand her position/state of mind at the time. I don't see how they could prosecute..what evidence besides her confession do they have? Let the old lady live out her life and be judged by God.

    Answer by yourspecialkid at 3:10 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • 1st, I'd want to know how sharp the old woman is mentally speaking? Could she be recalling past events as real, like a dementia or alzheimer's patient would? 2nd, what does the victim's family want? If she is competent & her confession is real, do they want to see a 96 y/o lady spend the rest of her months/years in jail? Or are they satisfied after their meeting w/ her? She has lived 65 years of her life as a law-abiding citizen, so by the time they get this to court for a possible conviction, she may pass away, wasting lots of time & money. It sounds like she may've done the equivalent of a deathbed confession, & wanted to clear her conscience before she dies. Personally, I say let her live out her remaining time at home or in a home.


    Answer by mrsmom110 at 3:26 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • Most cases like this I think if they are at a certain age. . .leave them be. . . they have had to live the their crimes and guilt for so long and will die before court. . .

    Answer by Kirs at 3:31 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • At 96 years of age it would a waste of money to take her to court.

    Answer by gammie at 4:00 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

  • Slow news day?! :o)

    Answer by LoriKeet at 6:03 PM on Jun. 8, 2011

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.