â€˘ â€śHottest Indian Chickâ€ť: Freida Pinto
â€˘ â€śHottest Pregnant Sri Lankanâ€ť: M.I.A
â€˘ â€śHottest Italian Chickâ€ť: Monica Belluci
â€˘ â€śHottest Chinese Chickâ€ť: Zhang Ziyi (sometimes credited as Ziyi Zhang)
While there may not be anything inherently wrong with saying someone is a "Hot Chinese woman" the seemingly arbitrary racial call-outs have people squirming. For example, why did the magazine deem Beyonce "Miss Millennium" but not "Miss African-American Millennium?" Mila Kunis was included in the top three hottie picks but the magazine didn't mention her Ukranian roots. And why was Kim Kardashian lauded for her performance in her 2007 sex tape but not labeled "Hottest Armenian Porn Star"?
"If the magazine were saying, 'These are all the beautiful women from every country in the world', that would be a bit different; that's what the Miss Universe pageant is all about," says Ruth C. White, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Social Work in the Department of Anthropology, Sociology, and Social Work at Seattle University. "But by calling out certain women's ethnicity and not others, what they're implying is that these women are not beautiful simply because they're beautiful; they're only attractive within the context of their own ethnicity. This is qualifying their beauty and dismisses the idea that beauty comes in many different forms."
Objectifying women in the media is an old song and dance. Studies
have shown that women are more likely than men to get picked apart and
seen as parts, rather than wholes. And it's no surprise that men's
magazines sell so well in part because they feature women in racy,
tantalizing photos. But reducing some women to tokens of their race (and
curiously not others) others is a new low.
Check out the full list of winners here. Is GQ being insensitive?