I know someone who adamantly objects to “participation” ribbons or prizes. When the kids came home with such mementos, they would be told that’s nice but you need to try harder next time so you can get the real thing, it only counts if you win. The parent’s reasoning was that if the kid was “rewarded” for not winning, he/she would fail to thrive, compete and win in the real world as an adult.
I know with younger children the general rule of thumb is to structure games as “no winner.” What do you think about this? Encourage participation no matter what the outcome, or discourage such practices in favor of fostering a more competitive ladder-climbing attitude? And, at what age to stop participation and start competition?
Posted by
on Aug. 6, 2012 at 3:16 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies:
1-7 of 7 replies
by
Carla
on Aug. 7, 2012 at 1:56 AM
Of course every parent wants their kid to be number one. But participation and having fun come first.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
by
Silver Member
on Aug. 7, 2012 at 1:34 PM
encouraging fun and participation is more important than winning.
by
on Aug. 8, 2012 at 12:14 AM
Exactly!
Quoting sweetlyblissful:
Of course every parent wants their kid to be number one. But participation and having fun come first.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
1-7 of 7 replies
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.



- WhiteIris
on Aug. 6, 2012 at 3:16 PM