Quoting ShannaBee:
My DH and I discussed this the other day. Neither of our kids are old enough. I think both parents should carry the child on their policy. CPs pay for their insurance on their car and NCPs pay the insurance for theirs. I find it silly that some NCPs have to pay the CPs car insurance because the SK is driving.
This is normally how I would feel too. However, no CS has ever exchanged hands in our case. Dh and BM made an agreement before I ever arrived on the scene. We had my sd's full-time for over 5 years with no CS and no monetary assistance at all from BM. Now she has them with no CS from us but we do pay for a variety of things that add up to several hundred monthly, just because we feel it's the right thing to do (school lunches, spending money, college fund contributions, ec fees, school supplies, clothes, etc.). We promised a long time ago to pay half of insurance when they got their licenses. It's more important than ever since BM's dh just lost his job and she is supporting the household singlehandedly right now.

I am an insurance agent. If the child does not live with you and is there infrequently, in my state you would be fine to not add her to your coverage. She would be a permissable user. You could also prove that she was insured on another car out of state. If I were you, I wouldn't add her. The only way I would was if she moved in with me at least half the time.



- blondepegasus
on May. 27, 2012 at 12:06 AM