With all these posts about the first child being entitled to the same amount of support BF should never have more kids never have his support lowered etc. And especially to you BM's that think the NCP should provide all the support what would you do if you never received a dime in support? My mom received $500 total support from my Bf in 18 years. She worked for the state, filed with the A.G. etc. My sperm donor is a musician he worked under the table no way to go after him. So what would you ladies do then? Seriously the sense of entitlement that you feel and want to claim it is the SM's. I call BS. How about you suck it up and do your part to support your own kids and be happy that your getting any CS because lots of women don't.
This post is not saying that children are not entitled to child support that is not my point at all. My point is why is that the first family and the first children are more important than later children. Why is it taking from a child if a man lists his new/child/ren as dependants? If it was the dad who had custody and the BM was trying to get her support lowered because she had more kids their would not be the outrage here. It is a double standard. All children should be entitled to the same amount of support and both parents should have to contribute to that support. That was the point of this post.
And for those of you slamming my dh . He could have his ex sell the house,land, cars, horses, etc and split it 50/50 no he gave it all to her in the divorce with it paid off. The land even had a well the only bills she had to pay was her car insurance, lights, and gas bill. He paid the kids insurance. Oh and she had to pay the property taxes but with working and getting 2k a month for 2 kids and 1300 a month for one child that should be plenty. Plenty of women would have loved to walk away with what she got. But if you ask her shes entitled to more and my dh is a lousy piece of crap.