According to the person dh spoke with, bm is claiming that sd lives with her half the time so she shouldn't have to pay cs. Dh is custodial parent. Sd is with bm 6 overnights a month. and bm lives over an hour away, HOW would she have 50/50 with a drive like that? I'm just baffled as to why she would think she could even claim that since there is a court order saying dh is primary parent and bm is to pay cs?
:: update ::
Dh got a letter yesterday that was a pretty standard form letter regarding the cs case, but in it it shows that bm now has an attorney to represent her. Bms last attorney dropped her because she ”could not ethically represent her” due to the fact that every time they'd go to court bm would lie to her attorney, in turn making her attorney look like an idiot when dh showed hard proof of all of bms lies.
So now it seems as if bm has hired someone new, who was the person to file the response saying bm has sd 50% of the time. I pointed out to dh that it's possible bm and her attorney will go through the whole calendar year and count every day sd was with bm (including holidays and extra time dh has given bm) and that would be their argument for ”50%”. He told me he's already done that and with the extra time bm still only has sd 25% of the year. So I guess bm has just found someone new to lie to?