Woman fights man she met online for a baby......crazy,crazy story
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/46247488/
Kristy Gaffney says she thought she’d found love when she met a man online. Now the Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania woman claims she’s in the battle of her life — fighting for the child they had.
“I thought like he was Mr. Perfect, ha, ha,” Gaffney told NBC10 Philadelphia investigator Harry Hairston. “There’s no words for it. I’m just so angry at him.”
Gaffney said she met a man who told her he was Ed while surfing a popular dating website. The single mother, who is 29, said at first she was standoffish, but eventually warmed up to meeting him at a public place. Gaffney says that first date was at a restaurant just outside of Philadelphia and it led to many more dates and an intimate relationship.
Gaffney said her new love interest told her he was a businessman, divorced, worked for the C.I.A. and was related to one of the most well-known, wealthiest families in the country.
“He said, ‘My last name is Dupont,’ and I’m like, okay. And I said, ‘related to the Duponts?’ And he said, ‘Yes.’”
Gaffney says eventually Ed started talking about wedding bells.
As their relationship continued, Gaffney got pregnant. She said at first Ed demanded she get an abortion and then changed his mind. After the baby was born, Gaffney said Ed asked her to sign some papers that would ensure he could claim his rights as the baby’s father. Gaffney said although she didn’t understand the paperwork, she signed it anyway and the two shared caring for the baby while Ed rehabbed his home so they could all live together as a family.
One day, Ed didn’t return their child as planned. Instead, Gaffney said he dropped this bombshell:
“That’s when he told me that the paperwork I actually signed was me giving up the rights, not to him to have his rights. It was me giving up my rights so his wife could adopt my baby, and I said, ‘Are you kidding me?’”
As it turned out, Ed wasn’t Ed Dupont. He was Emmitt Dippold, who was still married and he and his wife were in the final stages of adopting the baby.
“I couldn’t even believe that someone was capable of something like that,” Gaffney said. She took Dippold and his wife to court to get the adoption overturned.
We reached out to Dippold at his office and his home for his side of the story, but were not able to speak with him. In court documents, Dippold denied that he ever claimed to be a Dupont and says Gaffney may have assumed that because his email reads ‘ew-dupont.’ Dippold denied that he ever wanted Gaffney to have an abortion and denied that he ever talk about marriage. He said Gaffney should have known all along that he was married because pictures of he and his wife were in plain view the times he and Gaffney were in his home together.
In the end, the Judge believed Gaffney and overturned the adoption based on fraud. But the fight isn’t over because the Dippolds filed an appeal. Dippold’s attorney declined comment for our story, saying it’s inappropriate to talk about pending custody and adoption matters.
Well, that's one horrible way to go about getting a baby. :( Wonder if the wife was infertile and in on the gag?
I feel sorry for that child, most of all. The woman should have used more common sense, and THANK GOD/S she learned the truth in time to fight it! But it is the child who will pay the deepest price. I don't see this ending well in that regard. He'll either lose one or both parents entirely or be torn between the homes.
Why not read the contract before you sign it? If you don't understand it, it's your responsibility to have someone who CAN read it explain things for you.
This doesn't make any sense. Why would the wife be with someone who clearly cheated on her?
Seriously what the hell is wrong with people?? Those 2 (the husband and wife) deserve to sit their crooked asses in jail...
best of luck to her but really read the damn paper before you sign it next time.
That is why you never sign any legal document without reading it and UNDERSTANDING it. If you can't understand it then have an attorney review it.
Maybe she couldn't have a baby of her own and this was some elaborate scheme to get out of adoption costs?
By the way. I love your sigi.
Quoting Randi02:Why not read the contract before you sign it? If you don't understand it, it's your responsibility to have someone who CAN read it explain things for you.
This doesn't make any sense. Why would the wife be with someone who clearly cheated on her?
Check out these interesting topics from all over CafeMom:
- Smarter Living:Sun Safety
- Family Piggy Bank: Meet Your Goals
- Positive Parenting: Host a Card Shower
- Dinner Ideas: Ranch Spinach Pasta Salad
Happy Memorial Day.
if you can get past the fact her name is Nevaeh then take this poll Pic added
- 4everamber
on Feb. 14, 2012 at 5:08 PM