CafeMom
  • Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Mom Groups & Conversations
  • Videos for Moms
  • The Stir
  • Log InorJoin Now
  • In the Spotlight:
  • Moms Matter 2012
  • Healthy Plate
  • Family Piggy Bank
  • Healthy Habits
  • Inside The Kitchen
  • Dinner Ideas
  • Parenting Positive Kids
  • More
    • Smarter Living
    • Family Fun
Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!
Mom Confessions Mom Confessions
  • Home
  • Let's Talk! Click...
  • Photos
  • More
    • • Join CafeMom
Forums / Let's Talk! Click here to see posts...

Five Things That Are Not True About White People

Princess223
Posted by
  • Princess223
on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:12 AM
  • 265 Replies

 

Five Things That Are Not True About White People

 February 13, 2012

 

1. Working-class whites are more religious than upper-class whites.

This is a pervasive misconception encouraged by liberals who conflate the religious right with the working class, and by conservative evangelicals who inveigh against the godless ruling class. Certainly, white intellectual elites have become extremely secular. However, as a whole, the white upper middle class has long displayed higher attendance at worship services and stronger allegiance to their religious faith than the white working class — going all the way back to the first data collected in the 1920s and continuing today. Since the early 1970s, white America has become more secular overall, but the drop has been much greater in the working classes.As of the 2000s, the General Social Survey indicates, nearly 32 percent of upper-middle-class whites ages 30 to 49 attended church regularly, compared with 17 percent of the white working class in the same age group.

2. Elite colleges are bastions of white upper-middle-class privilege.

It’s common to assume that upper-middle-class white kids win more slots in top universities than middle-class or working-class students not because they’re smarter, but because their parents can afford to send them to the best grade schools and high schools, pay for SAT prep courses, or make hefty donations to colleges. There are two problems with this logic. First, ever since the landmark Coleman Report on educational equality back in 1966, scholars have had a hard time demonstrating that attending fancy elementary and secondary schools raises students’ academic performance. And on average, those highly touted test-preparation courses boost students’ SAT scores by only a few dozen points — a finding consistent across rigorous studies of test-prep programs.

Second, educational attainment is correlated with intelligence. (The mean IQ of white Americans with just a high school diploma is about 99; the mean IQ of whites with a professional degree is about 125.) And children’s IQ is tied to that of their parents. How genes and environment conspire to produce these relationships is irrelevant; the relationships have been stable for decades. As a result, white parents with advanced educations — who are also generally affluent — inevitably account for a disproportionate number of the white kids with the highest SAT scores, best grades and other evidence of academic excellence. If college admission were purely meritocratic — eliminating favoritism for the children of alumni, celebrities and big donors — upper-middle-class children would still be overrepresented. That’s because the applicants who would be accepted instead would also hail overwhelmingly from the upper middle class.

3. Marriage is breaking down throughout white America.

Overall marriage rates are indeed declining in the United States: Just over half of American adults are married, compared with 72 percent in 1960. However, among white Americans, there is a sharp class divide on marriage. The share of upper-middle-class whites ages 30 to 49 who are married has been steady since 1984, hovering around 84 percent. During that same period, marriage for working-class whites in the same age group has fallen from 70 percent to 48 percent. This is not a statistical artifact that can be explained by class differences in the age of marriage or the frequency of remarriage, nor by hard economic times for the working class. Marriage now constitutes a cultural fault line dividing the socioeconomic classes among white Americans.

4. White working-class men have a strong work ethic.

They used to, but not so much anymore. In 1968, 97 percent of white males ages 30 to 49 who had at most a high school diploma were in the labor force — meaning they either had a job or were actively seeking work. By March 2008 (before the Great Recession), that number had dropped to 88 percent. That means almost one out of eight white working-class men in the prime of life is not even looking for a job. This is not just an issue of “discouraged workers”; this rate of labor force dropouts rose in the boom years of the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s as rapidly as it did in years of recession. Among white males ages 30 to 49 who do have blue-collar or low-level service jobs, fewer work full time. The percentage of them who worked less than than 40 hours a week increased from 10 percent in 1960 to 20 percent in 2008, rising in good and bad economic times alike. Time-use surveys have further documented shifting behavior among unemployed men. In the early 2000s, compared with 1985, such men spent less time on job searches, education and training, household work, or civic and religious activities — and more time watching TV and sleeping.

5. White Americans are yesterday’s news.

You don’t need to see a young black family in the White House to understand that American demographics are changing. In the 2010 census, non-Latino whites made up 64 percent of the population, down from 69 percent in 2000, 76 percent in 1990 and 80 percent in 1980. In 2011, non-Latino whites for the first time constituted a minority of children under age 2 — the harbinger of a nation in which whites will be a minority. That’s no myth. Yet, 45 of 50 governors and 96 of 100 U.S. senators were still non-Latino whites in 2010. Whites also were 92 percent of the directors nominated for Academy Awards between 2000 and 2011. They were 96 percent of Fortune 500 chief executives in 2011. The numbers are similar for other influential positions in U.S. society. At least for now, the rhetoric about the fading role of whites in American life outruns reality.

Charles Murray is the W.H. Brady scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and the author of “Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010.”

 

gangsta-princess.gif - Funny Pictures for MySpace code

Posted by
  • Princess223
on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:12 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join CafeMom
Replies:
1-10 of 265 replies
12345 next last
Jump to page:Go
Fatal_Frost
by
  • Fatal_Frost
Bronze Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:15 AM

 O_o

Mommavieve
by
  • Mommavieve
Silver Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:15 AM
Uh huh...
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
AudlyLuvly
by
  • AudlyLuvly
Bronze Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:18 AM
43 moms liked this

I wonder if I posted something like this about "Five Things That Are Not True About Black People" how fast it would get deleted.

Uhura
by
  • Uhura
Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:18 AM
15 moms liked this

And why do we care about calling people white, black, or any other color?

People are people.

CafeMom Tickers CafeMom Tickers 

evensmummy
by
  • evensmummy
Silver Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM
8 moms liked this

You lost me at "This is a pervasive misconception encouraged by liberals." Sorry, I don't read obviously party biased articles. From either side. 

jpalmer
by
  • jpalmer
Bronze Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM
Okay...
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
luvcloudydays
by
  • luvcloudydays
Silver Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM
2 moms liked this
I DON'T CARE

just sayin
Anonymous
by Anonymous on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:21 AM
I was wondering the same thing...

Quoting AudlyLuvly:

I wonder if I posted something like this about "Five Things That Are Not True About Black People" how fast it would get deleted.

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
whoopsie16
by
  • whoopsie16
Bronze Member on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:21 AM


Quoting luvcloudydays:

I DON'T CARE

just sayin


R.I.P Molly, we love you! <3


Princess223
by
  • Princess223
on Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:22 AM
1 mom liked this


Quoting AudlyLuvly:

I wonder if I posted something like this about "Five Things That Are Not True About Black People" how fast it would get deleted.

Why don't U ask somebody in AUTHORITY on CM.


gangsta-princess.gif - Funny Pictures for MySpace code

1-10 of 265 replies
12345 next last
Jump to page:Go
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join CafeMom
  Previous Post: "I'm going crazy (vent) (long)" Next Post: "why is everything that is natural so wrong..."
Forums / Let's Talk! Click here to see posts...
Princess223
Mom Confessions
  • See All Posts in this Forum
  • See All Forums
  • Go to Group Home
Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!

Around CafeMom

Advertisement
Featured Today
  • Anonymous
    Happy Memorial Day. by Anonymous
  • I locked the door...
  • GIVEAWAY: "Summer Vacation!" 3 WILL WIN A PRIZE!!
Advertisement
Search this Group
Active Posts in Let's Talk! Click here to see posts...
  • Moms who hate bikinis... Beware
  • Would you allow your 11/12 year old daughter to wear this?
  • He Molested Her!
  • I have more money then people think I do...
  • You ladies would hate my dh.
More Active Posts »

Connect with CafeMom: Facebook Twitter You Tube Switch to Mobile Site Contact Us

Help: Getting Started Guide Member Resources Frequently Asked Questions Community Guidelines

About Us Advertising Info Privacy Policy Terms of Service Site Map

© 2012 CMI Marketing, Inc. All rights reserved.