Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

just to clear up some confusion

Posted by Anonymous   + Show Post

Despite the brouhaha over breast-feeding kicked off by a Time magazine cover photo this week of a mom nursing her 3-year-old son, that's actually the norm worldwide, experts say. But breast-feeding children that old is practiced among a tiny sliver of mothers in the United States.

Though some online are calling it "perverted" and "dangerous" to nurse a 3-year-old, "It's normal for our species. It's not perverted; it's not sex; it's not women doing it for some perverse need. It's normal like a nine-month pregnancy is normal," says Katherine Dettwyler, a professor of anthropology at the University of Delaware in Newark, Del.

Dettwyler has published numerous studies on breast-feeding and found that most children around the world are breast-fed for three to five years or longer.

That's a sharp contrast with babies in the United States. Numbers for 2011 show that about three-quarters of American babies are breast-fed at birth. By 6 months old, 44% are still being breast-fed and by 12 months just 24% are, says Laurence Grummer-Strawn, chief of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's nutrition branch.

The number of moms who breast-feed two years and beyond in the United States isn't known because the data come from a survey done of 18-month-old babies. But Ruby Roy, a pediatrician at La Rabida Children's Hospital in Chicago, Ill., says it's more common than might be believed, moms are just hiding it.

"There's so much negative social attitude that we just can't know," Roy says. "But I have had many women in my practice tell me that they are breast-feeding to two or three years. They're doing a night nursing before the baby goes to bed, or in the morning — but they're not going to tell anyone."

The World Health Organization recommends breast-feeding "up to two years of age or beyond." The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that "babies should continue to breast-feed for a year and for as long as is mutually desired by the mother and baby."

When Dettwyler studied 1,280 U.S. children whose mothers nursed them for more than three years, she found they were "perfectly fine and they didn't need therapy and they didn't think they were having sex with their mothers."

The children were nursed between three and nine years, with half being weaned between ages 3 and 4. The mothers tended to be middle- and upper-class women, the majority of whom were highly educated and worked outside of the home. "This is not the stereotype of the Earth Mother nursing the child until he's 5, and she also grows her own cotton and weaves her own diapers," Dettwyler says.

Multiple studies show that breast-feeding is beneficial for both mother and infant. Breast milk contains immune factors that protect children against infection while their own immune system is still developing. There also appears to be a programming effect on the body such that babies who nursed have lower rates of disease long after they are weaned.

Overall, studies have shown that breast-fed babies have lower rates of ear infections, eczema, diarrhea, lower respiratory tract infections, Sudden Infant Death syndrome, obesity, leukemia and childhood diabetes.

Mothers who breast-feed have lower rates of breast cancer and ovarian cancer, says Grummer-Strawn. The longer they breast-feed, the lower their rates.

It's also possible that we evolved to nurse children until they're around 5 or 6, says Dettwyler. Breast milk is one of the only sources of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids that build brain tissue, she says. It isn't until age 5 or 6 that "95% of brain growth has been reached, and that's also about the time that the child's immune system is ramped up to full production," she says.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/story/2012-05-11/breastfeeding-rates/54909940/1

Posted by Anonymous on May. 11, 2012 at 11:04 PM
Replies (51-60):
kcangel63
by Freebirther on May. 13, 2012 at 10:30 AM
Little and perky and beautiful.

:)


Quoting vrbtnseele:

The only thing I thought of when I saw that cover was how small the moms boobs are,...lol!
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 - Original Poster on May. 13, 2012 at 10:31 AM

Once again.  I barely got any thing pumping when dd was itty bitty and BF exclusively.  I sure as hell wouldn't get anything now that dd is 2 and bf 1-2 times a day.  Pumping is not an option.  Why must BFing be sexualized?

Quoting LANIE2002:

Quoting Anonymous:

Two-Words: Breast Pump




Thats what im thinking. The problem isnt the breastmilk its how the child is recieving the breastmilk. Pump it and put it in a cup.


GraceHudson
by on May. 13, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Bump!


JadedFaerie
by on May. 13, 2012 at 10:35 AM

Bravo for posting this. 

I see nothing wrong with breastfeeding a child until they lose their milk teeth. Sure, 7 years old would be too old for me PERSONALLY, but if someone else want's to do it, they can go for it. If I was still breastfeeding my cut off would have been 5.

Aeonix
by on May. 13, 2012 at 10:39 AM
I agree with all of this. I still thing TIME did a serious disservice to nursig moms everywhere by using that cover photo. Sure, they need to sell copies. But to do it in a way that just gets people further up in arms about breastfeeding was completely wrong IMO.
Aeonix
by on May. 13, 2012 at 10:41 AM
I'd also like to add, this sparked my brother asking me if I was STILL nursing my 8 month old, and if I planned to nurse until he is 6. The man was a registered nurse. I said my ds is only 8 months, he said 'I know! He's *8* months!'

Well, he's not old enough for just solids and definitely isn't old enough for cows milk, I am not about to give formula when my breasts are working just fine and ds is a very happy nurser. He's still a baby!!!
TugBoatMama
by on May. 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Am I the only ebf here that truly doesn't care about this story???
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
BrookeLisette
by Bronze Member on May. 13, 2012 at 1:12 PM

I guess time will tell ... I for one believe that will follow him well into his teens.  I think they did a disservice to nursing Mom's everywhere using that photo ... it was clearly used for shock value and to sell magazines, and I think that using a child in that way is wrong. 

Quoting Anonymous:

Oh please.  1st off she was FAR from naked.  This is a bunch of BS.  NO one will know it was him or even remeber his name.  He is 3.  His future class mates are also 3 they have no idea that this has even happend.  People are making this so much more than it is.  How old is he going to be when someone recognizes him?  Come on just ridiculous. 

Quoting BrookeLisette:

FORGET THE BREAST ... WHAT ABOUT THE BOY?



LANIE2002
by on May. 13, 2012 at 10:15 PM
Quoting Anonymous:




My thing isnt about sexualizing breastfeeding. Its hard to explain. I had the opposite problem from. I damn near drown my kids while breastfeeding them. I overproduced. I cld be feeding with one breast and the other wld start leaking and I cld fill a 4oz bottle just from that. When either of them wld feed to much milk wld flow. Neway my point with pump it and put it in a cup was that by 1 both of my children off the bottle, and pacifier. They were using sippy cups and by the time they were 2 they were using reg cups. I cldnt imagine at that age still breastfeeding them. If I was still producing I wld pump it and put it in a cup. Thats just my opinion.
Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 - Original Poster on May. 13, 2012 at 10:27 PM

ahh.  You where very lucky.  I would have died for a few stored up bottles of BM.  DD never took a pacifier or bottle, she moved right onto the sippy and at 2 has been using cups for a while now.  She only BF in the am (not always) and right before bed.  I think she is starting to self wean so I don't think we will be BFing much longer, but in my case from the tap is the only way.  : /

Quoting LANIE2002:

Quoting Anonymous:




My thing isnt about sexualizing breastfeeding. Its hard to explain. I had the opposite problem from. I damn near drown my kids while breastfeeding them. I overproduced. I cld be feeding with one breast and the other wld start leaking and I cld fill a 4oz bottle just from that. When either of them wld feed to much milk wld flow. Neway my point with pump it and put it in a cup was that by 1 both of my children off the bottle, and pacifier. They were using sippy cups and by the time they were 2 they were using reg cups. I cldnt imagine at that age still breastfeeding them. If I was still producing I wld pump it and put it in a cup. Thats just my opinion.


Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN