You say gays can't marry because they can't Naturally have children, then you shouldnt either
People talk about Gays can't married because they can't naturally have kids, So does that mean all the Hetro couples that can't have kids shouldn't get married? I mean they can't have them naturally sooo same premises... And the fact that the adopt more of the children that NEED it totally doesn't come into play right? You say they are forcing their beliefs on you? And yet what are you doing in return? Telling them they aren't as good because it's against YOUR beliefs.
Again on the benifits question, I saw an article that say marriage benifits are to benifit for the raising on children, so again those Hetro couples that Can't have kids fall under that same catagory.
So most of the statements in that Article says, that a marriage is to support a family and the purpose of raising kids, So then should Gays start a movement that If you can't have kids then You can't be married or have the benifits of the marriage since and I quote from the article
" It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children."
I could go on, But I thought I would point that simple fact out. If you are going to argue a main reason against is because they can't naturally have children then you should include the hetro's that can't either.