$40 shoes for a 3 month old, a 1 yr old and a 4 yr old??

[Anonymous]

would you pay $40 for a pair of shoes for a 3 month old, a 1 yr old or a 4 yr old???

[pipsmommy]

For a 1 year old I would pay more and get some Stride Rights.

[mab05]

I would not buy shoes fora 3 month old. what a waste.

[nomadbrat83]

That's about what my 21 month old's cost because she wears stride rite because it's the only ones that fit her wide feet

[dolphingurl1286]

No the most I would spend is $20 for the 4 yr old. I would spend a little less for the younger two.

[aschwarz06]

Hell no!!! My kids shoes are just fine and they cost $10-15 a piece

[beerabitch69]

Ugh. I wish they were that cheap.

[Anonymous - Original Poster]

he is almost 2 and he walks wonderfully so I am wanting to get him sturdy shoes

Quoting kmab0629:

For the older one yes, the babies, .. eh, ok for the 3 month old no.  The 1 yr old, if walking or learning to walk, probably.  We bought our little girl some at stride rite, the pre-walker ones for around 35ish.  The 3 month old though, prob not.  I love baby toes.  But that's just me.

[KeepJeep]

For a one and four year old absolutely! I have spent that before and will spend that amount again, but I wouldn't pay that for a 3 month old. No way.

[Anonymous]

no i wouldnt, the most i have spent on my sons shoes is $15 and they are doing fine barely even scuffed. 

[lapcounter]

Yes