Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Do you think birth control coverage should be mandatory, regardless of religious violations?

Posted by on Dec. 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM
  • 1 Replies

Pizza Chain Founder Sues Government for Requiring Him to Pay for Employee Birth Control

Posted by Jenny Erikson on December 17, 2012 

The devoutly Roman Catholic founder of Domino’s Pizza is suing the federal government over the mandatory contraception coverage in Obamacare. Tom Monaghan says that the health care law violates his rights to practice his religion, which does not allow the use of hormonal birth control.

Once intricately involved in day-to-day operations, Monaghan sold Domino’s for $1 billion in 1998, and has devoted much of his time and money since to Catholic causes. He has said, “I want to die broke.”

Currently, Domino's Pizza offers a health care plan to its eligible employees that excludes contraceptives and abortions. That isn't to say that they don't hire women that choose to use it or that have had abortions -- that would be discrimination. The company is simply not willing to pay for other people’s lifestyle choices.

One of the most controversial parts of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law by President Obama in 2010, and upheld by the Supreme Court in 2012, is the mandate that requires employers providing health insurance to their employees include contraception coverage. This has sparked a backlash from various religious communities, which see the requirement as a violation to their religious freedoms.

Domino’s Pizza is just one of the many companies nationwide taking action as the full implementation of Obamacare barrels down on us. Papa John’s Pizza CEO John Schnattar has said that he may have to cut employee hours to part-time status to avoid overwhelming costs. Applebee’s put a hiring freeze in place to deal with the expected consequences of rising health care costs and penalties and fees.

So far, Obamacare supporters have argued that those opposing the law just don’t understand that rich people have bottomless pockets and should feel honored to cut into their profits to provide “free” health insurance to the fry cooks rather than invest in new business to create new jobs and opportunities. But what about when it stops being about money and starts being about religion?

What’s more important in this Domino’s case? An American’s right to practice his religion as he sees fit? Or a woman’s ‘right’ to have her employer provide her with a health service that directly violates that religion? Our country needs to have a serious discussion on what constitutes rights because once we start saying it’s someone’s ‘right’ to have another person pay for their stuff, what else can our government do?

Do you think birth control coverage should be mandatory, regardless of religious violations?

by on Dec. 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-1):
joyfullem
by on Dec. 18, 2012 at 12:46 PM

I think that women do not have the 'right' to have her employer provide her with anything at all.  When you are hired somewhere it is a mutually benefical arrangement.  You sign a contract and you work.  No employer should be forced to pay of healthcare that is going to put them out of buisness and they should never have to go against their religious beliefs.  If they have a set unifor everyone is required to wear and then they hire a muslim that will only wear the outfits deemed appropriate to their religion it is required that they acoomodate them (as they should religious freedom and all) but christianity and catholosim and all others should be respected too.  Obama overstepped his boundraies with many of the clauses in Obamacare or Afordable Care Act

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)