Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Consorce.. WTF is that!

Anonymous
Posted by Anonymous
  • 21 Replies

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/12/11/dont-get-divorce-get-consorce/?intcmp=trending

Forty to fifty percent of all marriages in America end in divorce. That’s terrific news for divorce lawyers, but for millions of Americans the process of getting divorced can be psychologically traumatic and economically devastating, particularly when children are involved and two households must be maintained, rather than one. 

Depending on a couple’s finances and level of conflict, a divorce can cost $5,000 or $25,000 or $50,000 or even $500,000. 

Though it often seems unavoidable and the best solution for a failed adult relationship, the turmoil for kids who must maintain two bedrooms, losing contact with each of their parents for days during each week, is undeniable. 

In order to avoid the myriad costs of divorce, why not free one another from the expectation that one’s husband or wife is responsible for anything more than being a good partner in parenting and finance and a good roommate?

-

So, what if there was a different solution? What if no money were needed for this solution to a “failed” marriage, children were not displaced by it and it led to positive feelings between the parents involved?

Well, there is a different solution, and I have recommended it to some of the couples who have visited me, resolved to divorce. I call it a “consorce.” The word “divorce” comes from the Latin “divortium,” meaning separation or to turn and go separate ways. The new word “consorce” comes from the Latin for cohabitation.

The idea of married couples deciding on a “consorce,” rather than a divorce, is this: Why should a couple split up the family funds, maintain two dwellings, involve the courts in their lives, hire attorneys and cause each other months or years of suffering when they could simply agree that the romantic part of their marriage has ended and that they will remain married and live together as friends and partners, in order to maintain a level of consistency for their children? 

Why not just stay in the same house, continue to work together financially for the good of the family, and, perhaps, even sleep in the same room (without sexual contact expected by either individual)?

In order to avoid the myriad costs of divorce, why not free one another from the expectation that one’s husband or wife is responsible for anything more than being a good partner in parenting and finance and a good roommate?

Those who agree to a “consorce” are inherently agreeing on a “Don’t ask; Don’t tell” policy regarding their romantic lives. That part of their individual behavior becomes entirely private, again, and I believe it is best to never mention it to one another.

A consorce is not an “open marriage,” because the two parties are agreeing to no longer have a sexual relationship with one another, while maintaining the platonic aspects of their relationship (or even deepening them).

A consorce, rather than a divorce, pays tribute to the fact that having had children means that two adults will forever be partners in child rearing, even if they are no longer attracted to one another and even if they no longer trust one another as a confidant for intensely private and personal matters. 

It honors the notion that a couple’s relationship can be fueled by sexual attraction and mystery for years, even decades, then evolve into a friendship that includes no magnetic attraction. And it honors the fact that many couples who go through with a divorce never reunite because of the hassle of remarrying (and because divorce itself can cause terrible wounds), when those who agree on a “consorce” need only decide—with due consideration—to try intimacy, again.

In other words, unless and until either a married man or a married woman decides to marry, again, or to start a second family, why not leave the marital estate and architecture in place, saving lots of money and lots of misery by trying to live together as partners with the express purpose of maintaining a loving and lasting home for their children?

In my experience, relieving some couples who seemed destined for divorce of the expectation that they need to forever be involved with their partners’ romantically (or involved in their sexual behavior at all) allows them to maintain their households and become very reliable partners to one another and very close friends.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/12/11/dont-get-divorce-get-consorce/?intcmp=trending#ixzz2FT04EQk2


To summerize, this article talks about not divorcing and dividing the assests and all the nitty gritty, but rather live together, with the realiziation that your romantic relationship is over. I highly recommend reading the article before passing judgement.


I as what everyones opinion is... my curiousity stems from the fact that my "husband" and I are currently consorcing.

Posted by Anonymous on Dec. 18, 2012 at 10:56 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
bleumonster
by Sapphire Member on Dec. 18, 2012 at 10:59 PM
I think its fine until one or both falls in love with someone else.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 - Original Poster on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:01 PM


Quoting bleumonster:

I think its fine until one or both falls in love with someone else.

It does state that at the end.. that this works until one party decides to move on and marry.

Borne_Wonky
by on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:08 PM

That sounds good.

KG34
by Silver Member on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:11 PM

How could they possibly date other people?

If I met some guy who wanted to date me and he told me that he was still married, still lived with her, but they are really just "roommates", I'd be like, "Yeah, okay, hit the road, Jack. I'm not anybody's mistress."


Anonymous
by Anonymous 2 on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:15 PM

Dh and I for reasons that will remain private are separated but living in the same house while we get counseling and work on our marriage.  It is working for us. Right now we are more like room mates and friends while we work on the issues. It is working good so far. The kids just think Daddy sleeps on the pull out because of his snoring. When we have company, he sleeps in our bed but there is no sex etc etc. It works for us. We are determined to get through this and make our marriage better.  

Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 - Original Poster on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:20 PM


Quoting KG34:

How could they possibly date other people?

If I met some guy who wanted to date me and he told me that he was still married, still lived with her, but they are really just "roommates", I'd be like, "Yeah, okay, hit the road, Jack. I'm not anybody's mistress."


Its possible. (believe me.. im living it)

Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 - Original Poster on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:22 PM


Quoting Anonymous:

Dh and I for reasons that will remain private are separated but living in the same house while we get counseling and work on our marriage.  It is working for us. Right now we are more like room mates and friends while we work on the issues. It is working good so far. The kids just think Daddy sleeps on the pull out because of his snoring. When we have company, he sleeps in our bed but there is no sex etc etc. It works for us. We are determined to get through this and make our marriage better.  

Unfortunatley we have moved past the counseling and have full agreement to divorce down the line, this just works well for us right now.

Good luck, I hope things get better for you :)

Anonymous
by Anonymous 2 on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM

I am sorry it has to come to that.  You have tried that is what counts. I do see some improvement here, positive changes, so at this point I have hope. Thank you.


Quoting Anonymous:


Quoting Anonymous:

Dh and I for reasons that will remain private are separated but living in the same house while we get counseling and work on our marriage.  It is working for us. Right now we are more like room mates and friends while we work on the issues. It is working good so far. The kids just think Daddy sleeps on the pull out because of his snoring. When we have company, he sleeps in our bed but there is no sex etc etc. It works for us. We are determined to get through this and make our marriage better.  

Unfortunatley we have moved past the counseling and have full agreement to divorce down the line, this just works well for us right now.

Good luck, I hope things get better for you :)


Leissaintexas
by Emerald Member on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:31 PM
2 moms liked this
This makes no sense to me. This assumes that its the romance that's the problem. People who get divorced are doing so because they cannot stand each other. If you get along we'll enough to live in the same house, your marriage is not in that much trouble.
Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 - Original Poster on Dec. 18, 2012 at 11:33 PM


Quoting Leissaintexas:

This makes no sense to me. This assumes that its the romance that's the problem. People who get divorced are doing so because they cannot stand each other. If you get along we'll enough to live in the same house, your marriage is not in that much trouble.

That is not always the case. My husband and I are divorcing because there is no romance anymore... not because we hate each other. There are resentful feelings, but they do not keep us from living a well and happy day to day life.We have been living this way for a year now.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)