I recently was reading a really well put together article about circumcision...they had an excellent depiction of the difference in sensitivity between and intact and a circumcised penis. Also some great info on the function of the foreskin and why its not just an erroneous "flap of skin"
heres the chart if you dont feel like reading the whole thing:

http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/
a seriously comprehensive list of tons of peer reviewed scholarly articles regarding adverse affects of circumcisions. basically has every argument every made for anti circ plus a ton more lol
Quoting bowribbonmama:
Better not state facts. They'll say it's biased.
Quoting Kitschy:
What? Doesn't the human body have all kinds of useless parts?
Quoting GhettoKoolAide:
Don't you know ancedotal evidence is what counts on CM! Not facts, studies and you know medical proof.
Quoting svolkov:I recently was reading a really well put together article about circumcision...they had an excellent depiction of the difference in sensitivity between and intact and a circumcised penis. Also some great info on the function of the foreskin and why its not just an erroneous "flap of skin"
http://www.theweeklings.com/tgualtieri/2013/02/22/our-bodies-our-choices-part-ii-men-and-their-members/
heres the chart if you dont feel like reading the whole thing:
Quoting svolkov:
Thought this one wasb pretty good
Quoting GhettoKoolAide:
Don't you know ancedotal evidence is what counts on CM! Not facts, studies and you know medical proof.
Quoting GhettoKoolAide:
You thought wrong, missy! Lol. I'm going to wake up in the a.m. to this post flooded with " my son is fine!" and the ever popular and highly annoying " why do you care about my child's penis you sicko!?" You know that they say, ignorance is bliss.
Quoting svolkov:
Thought this one wasb pretty good
Quoting GhettoKoolAide:
Don't you know ancedotal evidence is what counts on CM! Not facts, studies and you know medical proof.



- svolkov
on Feb. 26, 2013 at 12:16 AM