I keep hearing from pro-choice people that they are fine with someone chosing abortion, BUT...
they don't think it's "right" to use it... well... more than a couple times.
Why not? What makes the difference? What is the magic number of "okay" and why is that number okay, but higher isnt?
Some pro- choice advocates acknowledge it was a potential baby. after all, if you do not terminate you are not going to birth another species.
with that line of reasoning some believe that while it should be safely accessible personal responsibility is also mandated.
and a pack of rubbers is cheaper than termination. if one can afford to terminate multiple times then one can definitely afford a condom or other form of birth control.
IMO Simply because that many abortions cant be good for your body. It eventually would do some sort of damage I am assuming. Other then that do what you need to do.
There are health risks with each one.
Not to mention it costs tax payers money (where I live). Buy some fucking condoms like the rest of us, it's not hard.
But I am pro choice.
Doesn't make a lick of difference to me. One or a hundred. And the simple fact being that it is a form of birth control, just more invasive.
I think it's a bad idea to have a high number of abortions simply because it's more invasive, involved, and over time could cause more problems than just getting a depo shot every three months. I'm not saying it should be forbidden, just that from a health standpoint it seems like a bad choice.
I'd agree with you if those same people wanted to put a LEGAL limit on the number of abortions. But if those people still support the legal right to choose, even if they don't morally agree with multiple abortions, that doesn't make them any less Pro-Choice.
Quoting Anonymous:
People like that aren't really pro-choice. They're pro-what I think you should do.
Do you ever get hit on even looking a mess?
Why inflict this silly cosmetic pain on a baby!?!
- ethans_momma06
on Mar. 21, 2013 at 11:22 PM