Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Mom Confessions Mom Confessions

Not Guilty!

Posted by on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:55 AM
  • 33 Replies
1 mom liked this
Yes! I am HAPPY Zimmerman walked. This whole damn was because of race anyways. Now Al Sharptons on TV spewing more racist blacks are so mistreated bullshit.
by on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:55 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
jobo
by Bronze Member on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:56 AM

It's ,bullshit..

GOBryan
by on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:58 AM

I agree that it was the correct verdict. There wasn't enough evidence to convict, therefore, they had to acquit. He'll be charged in Civil, as it should be. 

armyvet06
by Gold Member on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:58 AM
1 mom liked this
Yea well al sharpton is an idiot
KaylinC03
by Platinum Member on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:58 AM

The NAACP is having a meltdown right now. But, in all honestly, I feel the verdict was correct. I watched the whole trial and the evidence was there- self defense. 


Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:59 AM
No one gets "charged" in civil.


Quoting GOBryan:

I agree that it was the correct verdict. There wasn't enough evidence to convict, therefore, they had to acquit. He'll be charged in Civil, as it should be. 


cshepard
by Silver Member on Jul. 14, 2013 at 8:59 AM
1 mom liked this
I think it's bullshit. He shot an unarmed child.
GOBryan
by on Jul. 14, 2013 at 9:01 AM

Monetarily, they do. Not charged in the sense of doing time. 

Quoting Anonymous:

No one gets "charged" in civil.


Quoting GOBryan:

I agree that it was the correct verdict. There wasn't enough evidence to convict, therefore, they had to acquit. He'll be charged in Civil, as it should be. 



mybabybugssmile
by on Jul. 14, 2013 at 9:04 AM
1 mom liked this
In self defense. Although the media shows pictures from when he was 11-12 for racial sympathy, the wannabe gansta thug was 17.

Quoting cshepard:

I think it's bullshit. He shot an unarmed child.
cshepard
by Silver Member on Jul. 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM
1 mom liked this
It doesn't matter if he was a "wanna be gangsta thug" he was an unarmed child period and that dumbass should have never approached him.

Quoting mybabybugssmile:

In self defense. Although the media shows pictures from when he was 11-12 for racial sympathy, the wannabe gansta thug was 17.



Quoting cshepard:

I think it's bullshit. He shot an unarmed child.
Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 on Jul. 14, 2013 at 9:17 AM
It is not a charge it is a complaint. A criminal jury decided guilt.. A civil one finds liability. The judgment for the latter may include a monetary component but it is not a charge.


Quoting GOBryan:

Monetarily, they do. Not charged in the sense of doing time. 

Quoting Anonymous:

No one gets "charged" in civil.





Quoting GOBryan:

I agree that it was the correct verdict. There wasn't enough evidence to convict, therefore, they had to acquit. He'll be charged in Civil, as it should be. 





Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN