Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Mom Confessions Mom Confessions

Court won't allow 16yr old to have an abortion because she's not mature enough to make that choice

Posted by on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:01 PM
  • 115 Replies
2 moms liked this
Yet she's mature enough to parent a kid?!?!

-------

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — In a split decision released Friday, the Nebraska Supreme Court rejected a 16-year-old ward of the state's request to waive parental consent to get an abortion, saying the girl had not shown she is sufficiently mature and well-informed enough to decide on her own whether to have an abortion.

The girl, who is not named in the opinion, was living with foster parents this year when a juvenile court terminated the parental rights of her biological parents, who had physically abused and neglected her. In a closed hearing this summer, she told Douglas County District Judge Peter Bataillon she was 10 weeks pregnant and asked for a court order allowing an abortion. She said she would not be able to financially support a child and feared she might lose her foster placement if her foster parents, whom she described as having strong religious beliefs, learned of her pregnancy.

Her attorney, Catherine Mahern of Omaha, argued that the girl didn't need anyone's consent for an abortion under the regulations of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, which states that "if a ward decides to have an abortion, the consent of the parent(s) or Department is not required," although notification of the parents of the abortion might be required.

Nebraska law was changed in 2011 from requiring minors to inform parents of an abortion to requiring them to get the written, notarized consent of a parent or guardian. Exceptions are limited to cases of abuse by the parent or guardian, medical emergencies and instances in which the minor is sufficiently mature and well-informed to decide whether to have an abortion.

Bataillon rejected the girl's request, saying that for the purpose of her case, her foster parents would serve as her guardians — even though, under Nebraska law, the department is considered the guardian of wards. Bataillon also found that the girl had not shown she was mature enough to make the decision to seek an abortion.

Mahern appealed the girl's case, saying Bataillon failed to recognize the exception for abuse in Nebraska's parental consent law. She also said Bataillon should have recused himself because he was not impartial, as evidenced by his asking the girl if she knew that, "When you have the abortion, it's going to kill the child inside you."

"Probably the most disturbing aspect of this case was the judge's treatment of this young lady, referring to killing her baby," Mahern said Friday. "Who talks to a distressed 16-year-old girl like that?"

Court records found online make reference to a Peter Bataillon who served in the 1980s on a committee for Metro Right to Life, an Omaha anti-abortion group.

Bataillon did not immediately return a message Friday seeking comment on whether he had ever served on a committee for that or any other anti-abortion group.

Under an expedited process, the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld Bataillon's ruling in August but did not issue a public opinion on it until Friday.

In the 5-2 opinion, the majority sided with the judge, saying that the abuse exemption does not apply to the girl, finding that a pregnant minor must show, for the purpose of waiving parental consent, that any abuse occurred at the hands of a current parent or guardian. It also found the girl did not prove she was sufficiently mature or well-informed enough to decide to have an abortion.

As for her argument that the child protection agency's regulations don't require state wards to get parental or agency consent for an abortion, the majority determined that Bataillon was limited to considering only the parameters laid out in the state's parental consent law, which does not spell out from whom state wards would get consent.

The high court did not consider the girl's argument that Bataillon should have recused himself, because she did not ask him to do so or question his impartiality at trial.

In a dissent, Justice William Connolly said the girl has no legal parents, and, therefore, didn't have the option of seeking parental consent. That, he said, means the lower court lacked jurisdiction in the case and left her "in a legal limbo — a quandary of the Legislature's making."

He also suggested that Nebraska's parental consent law is open to a constitutional challenge by state wards.

"I realize that this conclusion means that none of the statutory exceptions apply and that under (the state law), the petitioner is prohibited from obtaining an abortion," Connolly wrote. "An absolute ban on the petitioner's right to seek an abortion obviously raises constitutional concerns."

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
by on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
Roxygurl
by Emerald Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:09 PM
BUMP
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
PinkButterfly66
by Emerald Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:13 PM
9 moms liked this

This is exactly why the parental consent/notification law is so fucking bogus.  If I were that girl's attorney, I'd drive her out of state for that abortion.  And yes, I realize I would face criminal charges and disbarment. But some things are worth facing jail time and loss of career.

The girl is in the foster care system, so how does the abuse exception not apply?

Roxygurl
by Emerald Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:14 PM
1 mom liked this
The girl says she can't support a kid yet that doesn't show maturity in the judges eyes to make her own decision?

So what happens when this baby is born? The mother is already in foster care, meaning the state is paying for her so now the state will have a brand new baby to support probably until it turns 18.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Roxygurl
by Emerald Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:15 PM
4 moms liked this
What bothers me is the obvious bias from the judge, you can not do that. You have to me impartial, no matter your personal beliefs you have to follow the law and he didn't. It was apparent he was pro-life from the get go.

Quoting PinkButterfly66:

This is exactly why the parental consent/notification law is so fucking bogus.  If I were that girl's attorney, I'd drive her out of state for that abortion.  And yes, I realize I would face criminal charges and disbarment. But some things are worth facing jail time and loss of career.

The girl is in the foster care system, so how does the abuse exception not apply?

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
kmjmlj
by Silver Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM
1 mom liked this
What if she tries to end the pregnancy on her own? If she dies as well whose going to take the blame?
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Roxygurl
by Emerald Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM
She's not mature after all so it would just be an unfortunate mishap with an immature teen.

Quoting kmjmlj:

What if she tries to end the pregnancy on her own? If she dies as well whose going to take the blame?
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
honeyrder
by Platinum Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM
1 mom liked this

What the fuck? Fucking stupid.

PinkButterfly66
by Emerald Member on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:17 PM

And even if she appeals, by the time it gets to court it will be too late for an abortion.

Quoting Roxygurl:

What bothers me is the obvious bias from the judge, you can not do that. You have to me impartial, no matter your personal beliefs you have to follow the law and he didn't. It was apparent he was pro-life from the get go.

Quoting PinkButterfly66:

This is exactly why the parental consent/notification law is so fucking bogus.  If I were that girl's attorney, I'd drive her out of state for that abortion.  And yes, I realize I would face criminal charges and disbarment. But some things are worth facing jail time and loss of career.

The girl is in the foster care system, so how does the abuse exception not apply?


parentalrights1
by on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:18 PM
1 mom liked this
She's not mature enough to have an abortion but she's mature enough to be forced to carry a pregnancy, be sick, in pain, and have her legs ripped open.

Pro life = derp
Anonymous
by Anonymous 1 on Oct. 4, 2013 at 11:18 PM
This is bullshit.... Poor kid and poor baby. This just all around sucks I wish I could take her in and help her raise her child or take her to the clinic and give her the guidance and support she needs :(
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)