Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

Stephen King's Message To Romney:

Posted by on May. 1, 2012 at 12:17 AM
  • 41 Replies

Stephen King: Tax Me, for F@%&’s Sake!

The iconic writer scolds the superrich (including himself—and Mitt Romney) for not giving back, and warns of a Kingsian apocalyptic scenario if inequality is not addressed in America.

Chris Christie may be fat, but he ain’t Santa Claus. In fact, he seems unable to decide if he is New Jersey’s governor or its caporegime, and it may be a comment on the coarsening of American discourse that his brash rudeness is often taken for charm. In February, while discussing New Jersey’s newly amended income-tax law, which allows the rich to pay less (proportionally) than the middle class, Christie was asked about Warren Buffett’s observation that he paid less federal income taxes than his personal secretary, and that wasn’t fair. “He should just write a check and shut up,” Christie responded, with his typical verve. “I’m tired of hearing about it. If he wants to give the government more money, he’s got the ability to write a check—go ahead and write it.”


 

 
 

Heard it all before. At a rally in Florida (to support collective bargaining and to express the socialist view that firing teachers with experience was sort of a bad idea), I pointed out that I was paying taxes of roughly 28 percent on my income. My question was, “How come I’m not paying 50?” The governor of New Jersey did not respond to this radical idea, possibly being too busy at the all-you-can-eat cheese buffet at Applebee’s in Jersey City, but plenty of other people of the Christie persuasion did.

Cut a check and shut up, they said.

If you want to pay more, pay more, they said.

Tired of hearing about it, they said.

Tough shit for you guys, because I’m not tired of talking about it. I’ve known rich people, and why not, since I’m one of them? The majority would rather douse their dicks with lighter fluid, strike a match, and dance around singing “Disco Inferno” than pay one more cent in taxes to Uncle Sugar. It’s true that some rich folks put at least some of their tax savings into charitable contributions. My wife and I give away roughly $4 million a year to libraries, local fire departments that need updated lifesaving equipment (Jaws of Life tools are always a popular request), schools, and a scattering of organizations that underwrite the arts. Warren Buffett does the same; so does Bill Gates; so does Steven Spielberg; so do the Koch brothers; so did the late Steve Jobs. All fine as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go far enough.

What charitable 1 percenters can’t do is assume responsibility—America’s national responsibilities: the care of its sick and its poor, the education of its young, the repair of its failing infrastructure, the repayment of its staggering war debts. Charity from the rich can’t fix global warming or lower the price of gasoline by one single red penny. That kind of salvation does not come from Mark Zuckerberg or Steve Ballmer saying, “OK, I’ll write a $2 million bonus check to the IRS.” That annoying responsibility stuff comes from three words that are anathema to the Tea Partiers: United American citizenry.

more-tax-teaser-new

And hey, why don’t we get real about this? Most rich folks paying 28 percent taxes do not give out another 28 percent of their income to charity. Most rich folks like to keep their dough. They don’t strip their bank accounts and investment portfolios. They keep them and then pass them on to their children, their children’s children. And what they do give away is—like the monies my wife and I donate—totally at their own discretion. That’s the rich-guy philosophy in a nutshell: don’t tell us how to use our money; we’ll tell you.

The Koch brothers are right-wing creepazoids, but they’re giving right-wing creepazoids. Here’s an example: 68 million fine American dollars to Deerfield Academy. Which is great for Deerfield Academy. But it won’t do squat for cleaning up the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, where food fish are now showing up with black lesions. It won’t pay for stronger regulations to keep BP (or some other bunch of dipshit oil drillers) from doing it again. It won’t repair the levees surrounding New Orleans. It won’t improve education in Mississippi or Alabama. But what the hell—them li’l crackers ain’t never going to go to Deerfield Academy anyway. Fuck ’em if they can’t take a joke.

Here’s another crock of fresh bullshit delivered by the right wing of the Republican Party (which has become, so far as I can see, the only wing of the Republican Party): the richer rich people get, the more jobs they create. Really? I have a total payroll of about 60 people, most of them working for the two radio stations I own in Bangor, Maine. If I hit the movie jackpot—as I have, from time to time—and own a piece of a film that grosses $200 million, what am I going to do with it? Buy another radio station? I don’t think so, since I’m losing my shirt on the ones I own already. But suppose I did, and hired on an additional dozen folks. Good for them. Whoopee-ding for the rest of the economy.

Tired of hearing about it, they said. Tough shit for you guys, because I’m not tired of talking about it. I’ve known rich people, and why not, since I’m one ofthem?

At the risk of repeating myself, here’s what rich folks do when they get richer:they invest. A lot of those investments are overseas, thanks to the anti-American business policies of the last four administrations. Don’t think so? Check the tag on that T-shirt or gimme cap you’re wearing. If it says MADE IN AMERICA, I’ll … well, I won’t say I’ll eat your shorts, because some of that stuff ismade here, but not much of it. And what does get made here doesn’t get made by America’s small cadre of pluted bloatocrats; it’s made, for the most part, in barely-gittin’-by factories in the Deep South, where the only unions people believe in are those solemnized at the altar of the local church (as long as they’re from different sexes, that is).


The U.S. senators and representatives who refuse even to consider raising taxes on the rich—they squall like scalded babies (usually on Fox News) every time the subject comes up—are not, by and large, superrich themselves, although many are millionaires and all have had the equivalent of Obamacare for years. They simply idolize the rich. Don’t ask me why; I don’t get it either, since most rich people are as boring as old, dead dog shit. The Mitch McConnells and John Boehners and Eric Cantors just can’t seem to help themselves. These guys and their right-wing supporters regard deep pockets like Christy Walton and Sheldon Adelson the way little girls regard Justin Bieber … which is to say, with wide eyes, slack jaws, and the drool of adoration dripping from their chins. I’ve gotten the same reaction myself, even though I’m only “baby rich” compared with some of these guys, who float serenely over the lives of the struggling middle class like blimps made of thousand-dollar bills.

In America, the rich are hallowed. Even Warren Buffett, who has largely been drummed out of the club for his radical ideas about putting his money where his mouth is when it comes to patriotism, made the front pages when he announced that he had stage-1 prostate cancer. Stage 1, for God’s sake! A hundred clinics can fix him up, and he can put the bill on his American Express black card! But the press made it sound like the pope’s balls had just dropped off and shattered! Because it was cancer? No! Because it was Warren Buffett, he of Berkshire-Hathaway!

I guess some of this mad right-wing love comes from the idea that in America, anyone can become a Rich Guy if he just works hard and saves his pennies.Mitt Romney has said, in effect, “I’m rich and I don’t apologize for it.” Nobody wants you to, Mitt. What some of us want—those who aren’t blinded by a lot of bullshit persiflage thrown up to mask the idea that rich folks want to keep their damn money—is for you to acknowledge that you couldn’t have made it in America without America. That you were fortunate enough to be born in a country where upward mobility is possible (a subject upon which Barack Obama can speak with the authority of experience), but where the channels making such upward mobility possible are being increasingly clogged. That it’s not fair to ask the middle class to assume a disproportionate amount of the tax burden. Not fair? It’s un-fucking-American is what it is. I don’t want you to apologize for being rich; I want you to acknowledge that in America, we all should have to pay our fair share. That our civics classes never taught us that being American means that—sorry, kiddies—you’re on your own. That those who have received much must be obligated to pay—not to give, not to “cut a check and shut up,” in Governor Christie’s words, but to pay—in the same proportion. That’s called stepping up and not whining about it. That’s called patriotism, a word the Tea Partiers love to throw around as long as it doesn’t cost their beloved rich folks any money.

This has to happen if America is to remain strong and true to its ideals. It’s a practical necessity and a moral imperative. Last year during the Occupy movement, the conservatives who oppose tax equality saw the first real ripples of discontent. Their response was either Marie Antoinette (“Let them eat cake”) or Ebenezer Scrooge (“Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?”). Short-sighted, gentlemen. Very short-sighted. If this situation isn’t fairly addressed, last year’s protests will just be the beginning. Scrooge changed his tune after the ghosts visited him. Marie Antoinette, on the other hand, lost her head.

by on May. 1, 2012 at 12:17 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
NancSBRN
by Bronze Member on May. 1, 2012 at 10:41 AM
2 moms liked this

I love Stephen King :)

_Kissy_
by on May. 1, 2012 at 1:28 PM
1 mom liked this

That man is a hell of a writer..

rccmom
by Gold Member on May. 1, 2012 at 1:35 PM
4 moms liked this

I understand that people want to make sure their money is used properly by the govt, but I think we have lost that sense of we are a country and we are all in it together. Paying  taxes is not something that should be automatically resented. It is a civic responsibility.

One thing I have discovered by moving about is that it seems to me a lot of places where we have lived that have low taxes also have low community supports. Places that have had higher taxes tend to have more parks, libraries, community centers, and such that make living there more of a pleasure. You get what you pay for.

mommygiggles317
by Silver Member on May. 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM
2 moms liked this

And this is why he has always been my favorite author... bow down

love you signExercising Knowledge, Wisdom and Understanding...

Meadowchik
by Gold Member on May. 1, 2012 at 3:18 PM
3 moms liked this

 I have a message for Stephen King and all the other wealthy folks out there who are for higher taxes...the IRS accepts donations.  Go ahead and pay more than you owe in taxes if you wish.  If you believe government can do more good with your money than you can, then by all means, redistribute it to the government.

And, BTW Romney had and does indeed acknowledge what a blessing it is we have as Americans in America where upward mobility is possible.

When is King running?  When will he devote his time and energies to serving in public office?

"We have a moral responsibility to not spend more than we take in." -Mitt Romney 2012

Visit Mitt Romney for President, CafeMom Group

UpSheRises
by on May. 1, 2012 at 4:21 PM
2 moms liked this


Quoting Meadowchik:

 I have a message for Stephen King and all the other wealthy folks out there who are for highêr taxes...the IRS accepts donations.  Go ahead and pay more than you owe in taxes if you wish.  If you believe government can do more good with your money than you can, then by all means, redistribute it to the government.

And, BTW Romney had and does indeed acknowledged what a blessing it is as Americans where upward mobility is possible.

When is King running?  When we devote his time and energies to serving in public office?

How do you make a donation to the IRS?

JackieGirl007
by on May. 1, 2012 at 4:45 PM
3 moms liked this

 Do we also have a moral responsibility to bail out fraudulent banks? How about the moral responsibility of detaining people of this country indefinately with no just cause or defense?

 How about telling the truth? How about standing by what you say and not changing it to please whomever you are wanting something from? How about helping those facing foreclosure rather than your rich friends at the bank?

 Do we have a moral responsibility to kill innocent people in Iran as well?

 

Wow. I think you're the first person I've ever seen who actually likes this man. Are you LDS?

JackieGirl007
by on May. 1, 2012 at 4:46 PM

 This was meant as a reply to meadowchick

Quoting JackieGirl007:

 Do we also have a moral responsibility to bail out fraudulent banks? How about the moral responsibility of detaining people of this country indefinately with no just cause or defense?

 How about telling the truth? How about standing by what you say and not changing it to please whomever you are wanting something from? How about helping those facing foreclosure rather than your rich friends at the bank?

 Do we have a moral responsibility to kill innocent people in Iran as well?

 

Wow. I think you're the first person I've ever seen who actually likes this man. Are you LDS?

 

29again
by Gold Member on May. 1, 2012 at 6:37 PM
5 moms liked this

All these leftists who are screaming for a Buffet rule, or who want to be forced to pay higher more taxes can just pay more!  And they can do it legally, without a new tax code, too!  All they have to do is to stop taking all those deductions, to only take the standard deduction that every single American gets to take.  No one is making them write off all the stupid stuff that they write off as a tax break.  All this BS about "tax me more!!!" is just a bunch of drama.  They don't want to pay more, if they did, they would already!

Meadowchik
by Gold Member on May. 1, 2012 at 6:44 PM


Quoting JackieGirl007:

 Do we also have a moral responsibility to bail out fraudulent banks? How about the moral responsibility of detaining people of this country indefinately with no just cause or defense?

 How about telling the truth? How about standing by what you say and not changing it to please whomever you are wanting something from? How about helping those facing foreclosure rather than your rich friends at the bank?

 Do we have a moral responsibility to kill innocent people in Iran as well?

 

Wow. I think you're the first person I've ever seen who actually likes this man. Are you LDS?

Talk about a whole bunch of gotchya questions!  Do you like eating puppies for breakfast?

;)


"We have a moral responsibility to not spend more than we take in." -Mitt Romney 2012

Visit Mitt Romney for President, CafeMom Group

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN