Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

New York Times: Why Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals

Why Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals

WHO is happier about life — liberals or conservatives? The answer might seem straightforward. After all, there is an entire academic literature in the social sciences dedicated to showing conservatives as naturally authoritarian, dogmatic, intolerant of ambiguity, fearful of threat and loss, low in self-esteem and uncomfortable with complex modes of thinking. And it was the candidate Barack Obama in 2008 who infamously labeled blue-collar voters “bitter,” as they “cling to guns or religion.” Obviously, liberals must be happier, right?

Wrong. Scholars on both the left and right have studied this question extensively, and have reached a consensus that it is conservatives who possess the happiness edge. Many data sets show this. For example, the Pew Research Center in 2006 reported that conservative Republicans were 68 percent more likely than liberal Democrats to say they were “very happy” about their lives. This pattern has persisted for decades. The question isn’t whether this is true, but why.

Many conservatives favor an explanation focusing on lifestyle differences, such as marriage and faith. They note that most conservatives are married; most liberals are not. (The percentages are 53 percent to 33 percent, according to my calculations using data from the 2004 General Social Survey, and almost none of the gap is due to the fact that liberals tend to be younger than conservatives.) Marriage and happiness go together. If two people are demographically the same but one is married and the other is not, the married person will be 18 percentage points more likely to say he or she is very happy than the unmarried person.

The story on religion is much the same. According to the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey, conservatives who practice a faith outnumber religious liberals in America nearly four to one. And the link to happiness? You guessed it. Religious participants are nearly twice as likely to say they are very happy about their lives as are secularists (43 percent to 23 percent). The differences don’t depend on education, race, sex or age; the happiness difference exists even when you account for income.

Whether religion and marriage should make people happy is a question you have to answer for yourself. But consider this: Fifty-two percent of married, religious, politically conservative people (with kids) are very happy — versus only 14 percent of single, secular, liberal people without kids.

An explanation for the happiness gap more congenial to liberals is that conservatives are simply inattentive to the misery of others. If they recognized the injustice in the world, they wouldn’t be so cheerful. In the words of Jaime Napier and John Jost, New York University psychologists, in the journal Psychological Science, “Liberals may be less happy than conservatives because they are less ideologically prepared to rationalize (or explain away) the degree of inequality in society.” The academic parlance for this is “system justification.”

The data show that conservatives do indeed see the free enterprise system in a sunnier light than liberals do, believing in each American’s ability to get ahead on the basis of achievement. Liberals are more likely to see people as victims of circumstance and oppression, and doubt whether individuals can climb without governmental help. My own analysis using 2005 survey data from Syracuse University shows that about 90 percent of conservatives agree that “While people may begin with different opportunities, hard work and perseverance can usually overcome those disadvantages.” Liberals — even upper-income liberals — are a third less likely to say this.

So conservatives are ignorant, and ignorance is bliss, right? Not so fast, according to a study from the University of Florida psychologists Barry Schlenker and John Chambers and the University of Toronto psychologist Bonnie Le in the Journal of Research in Personality. These scholars note that liberals define fairness and an improved society in terms of greater economic equality. Liberals then condemn the happiness of conservatives, because conservatives are relatively untroubled by a problem that, it turns out, their political counterparts defined.

Imagine the opposite. Say liberals were the happy ones. Conservatives might charge that it is only because liberals are unperturbed by the social welfare state’s monstrous threat to economic liberty. Liberals would justifiably dismiss this argument as solipsistic and silly.

There is one other noteworthy political happiness gap that has gotten less scholarly attention than conservatives versus liberals: moderates versus extremists.

Political moderates must be happier than extremists, it always seemed to me. After all, extremists actually advertise their misery with strident bumper stickers that say things like, “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention!”

But it turns out that’s wrong. People at the extremes are happier than political moderates. Correcting for income, education, age, race, family situation and religion, the happiest Americans are those who say they are either “extremely conservative” (48 percent very happy) or “extremely liberal” (35 percent). Everyone else is less happy, with the nadir at dead-center “moderate” (26 percent).

What explains this odd pattern? One possibility is that extremists have the whole world figured out, and sorted into good guys and bad guys. They have the security of knowing what’s wrong, and whom to fight. They are the happy warriors.

Whatever the explanation, the implications are striking. The Occupy Wall Street protesters may have looked like a miserable mess. In truth, they were probably happier than the moderates making fun of them from the offices above. And none, it seems, are happier than the Tea Partiers, many of whom cling to guns and faith with great tenacity. Which some moderately liberal readers of this newspaper might find quite depressing.

Arthur C. Brooks is the president of the American Enterprise Institute and the author of “The Road to Freedom” and “Gross National Happiness.”

by on Jul. 9, 2012 at 6:50 PM
Replies (81-89):
PamR
by Platinum Member on Jul. 10, 2012 at 7:26 PM
1 mom liked this

You need a new picture, zilla.  And a new line. 

Kate_Momof3
by Platinum Member on Jul. 10, 2012 at 7:43 PM

Bless her heart.

Quoting PamR:

You need a new picture, zilla.  And a new line. 


imamomzilla
Report
It's been a while!
Yesterday at 3:01 PM
by on Jul. 10, 2012 at 7:45 PM

 Yours too, Katie...

blowing kisses

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

Bless her heart.

Quoting PamR:

You need a new picture, zilla.  And a new line. 


 

Kate_Momof3
by Platinum Member on Jul. 10, 2012 at 7:48 PM

*pats zilla's head* 

It's OK. You can let the adults continue the conversation now. Or be a pest. 

Quoting imamomzilla:

 Yours too, Katie...

blowing kisses

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

Bless her heart.

Quoting PamR:

You need a new picture, zilla.  And a new line. 


 


imamomzilla
Report
It's been a while!
Yesterday at 3:01 PM
by on Jul. 10, 2012 at 7:51 PM

 Why are you so sad and bitter? frown mini Will a cookie cheer you up?

baking

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

*pats zilla's head* 

It's OK. You can let the adults continue the conversation now. Or be a pest. 

Quoting imamomzilla:

 Yours too, Katie...

blowing kisses

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

Bless her heart.

Quoting PamR:

You need a new picture, zilla.  And a new line. 


 


 

Kate_Momof3
by Platinum Member on Jul. 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM

Shoo now. Shoo!

Quoting imamomzilla:

 Why are you so sad and bitter? frown mini Will a cookie cheer you up?

baking

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

*pats zilla's head* 

It's OK. You can let the adults continue the conversation now. Or be a pest. 

Quoting imamomzilla:

 Yours too, Katie...

blowing kisses

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

Bless her heart.

Quoting PamR:

You need a new picture, zilla.  And a new line. 


 


 


mommygiggles317
by Silver Member on Jul. 10, 2012 at 8:45 PM


Quoting imamomzilla:

 At least you're consistent with the "sarcasm". ;-) LOL

Did you forget which screen name you were using or is that an admission of guilt? I wonder which alt will reply....hmm...

Quoting mommygiggles317:


Quoting imamomzilla:

 OIC.

Quoting rccmom:

..."I find it less damaging to the representation of Jesus than a lot of other posts on here by "Christians." She posted such language out of frustration and anger, but other posts seem to be designed to be deliberately deceitful, hurtful, and much more damaging to the image of Christianity."

Quoting rccmom:

Probably something similiar. If I am not mistaken, Asfriend is playing. I actually really like her. She is pretty honest, sarcastic as all get out, and often funny. Jesus usually spoke with people where they were at, and He probably understood both my sarcasm and intent in my post. So, don't worry, but thanks for your concern! 

Asfriend, if you weren't playing, then I am sorry. I really do like you! 
 

Quoting imamomzilla:

 Ouch.

WWJD?

Quoting rccmom:

Well, you can't stop something, unless you have started something, but I don't expect conservatives with their limited IQs to understand such nuances.

Quoting asfriend:

Too bad that you couldn't have stopped before you got started.


Quoting rccmom:

Strangely enough, I remembere another study that showed people of higher intelligence tend to be less happy, and it just so happens another study showed Liberals were on average more intelligent than conservatives. Hmmm...maybe that's your answer right there.


Or maybe we should stop all these silly studies of trying to prove one side gives more, is smarter, or is more happy, and etc.. 



 


 

You love me don't you?...lol...

 

Sweetie, there is only one MommyGiggles... and as you are learning... my friends call me Giggles for a reason... lol... Enjoy your night... (no sarcasm)... lol...

love you signExercising Knowledge, Wisdom and Understanding...

Kate_Momof3
by Platinum Member on Jul. 10, 2012 at 10:02 PM
Who else could you be???

Quoting mommygiggles317:


Quoting imamomzilla:

 At least you're consistent with the "sarcasm". ;-) LOL


Did you forget which screen name you were using or is that an admission of guilt? I wonder which alt will reply....hmm...


Quoting mommygiggles317:




Quoting imamomzilla:


 OIC.


Quoting rccmom:

..."I find it less damaging to the representation of Jesus than a lot of other posts on here by "Christians." She posted such language out of frustration and anger, but other posts seem to be designed to be deliberately deceitful, hurtful, and much more damaging to the image of Christianity."


Quoting rccmom:


Probably something similiar. If I am not mistaken, Asfriend is playing. I actually really like her. She is pretty honest, sarcastic as all get out, and often funny. Jesus usually spoke with people where they were at, and He probably understood both my sarcasm and intent in my post. So, don't worry, but thanks for your concern! 


Asfriend, if you weren't playing, then I am sorry. I really do like you! 
 


Quoting imamomzilla:


 Ouch.


WWJD?


Quoting rccmom:


Well, you can't stop something, unless you have started something, but I don't expect conservatives with their limited IQs to understand such nuances.


Quoting asfriend:

Too bad that you couldn't have stopped before you got started.



Quoting rccmom:


Strangely enough, I remembere another study that showed people of higher intelligence tend to be less happy, and it just so happens another study showed Liberals were on average more intelligent than conservatives. Hmmm...maybe that's your answer right there.



Or maybe we should stop all these silly studies of trying to prove one side gives more, is smarter, or is more happy, and etc.. 





 




 


You love me don't you?...lol...


 

Sweetie, there is only one MommyGiggles... and as you are learning... my friends call me Giggles for a reason... lol... Enjoy your night... (no sarcasm)... lol...

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Meadowchik
by Gold Member on Jul. 11, 2012 at 4:52 AM
1 mom liked this

I shouldn't be obligated by the collective to give, it is a decision which should come straight from me. IMO, "giving" manipulated by force tends to concentrate power that becomes easier and easier to syphon off by a select few.  That's one of the many vulnerabilities of involuntary giving. 

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

Oh, really? Ayn Rand who seems to be the poster girl for free marketers, would emphatically disagree. According to Rand, altruism is the anti-thesis of the individual. The individual should never feel obligated by morality to give. By virtue of that obligation, one has become beholden to the collective. Once that is established, there is no purely free market. 

It's all there in her works and in the works of freemarket Randites.

Quoting Meadowchik:

On the contrary: the article speculated about why conservatives tend to be more happy.  Charitable habits are an obvious answer: conservatives give more money and donate more time, and psychologists say that giving and helping increases a sense of happiness. 

Altruism is not loathed by free-marketers, dear, and free markets and altruism can exist together.

 

Quoting Kate_Momof3:

And that has nothing to do with political affiliation. The study suggests that there is a certain out of sight out of mind mindset, nothing about altruism. Which is loathed, as you know, by free marketers.

Quoting Meadowchik:

 

Quoting _Kissy_:

This article actually paints conservatives in a bad light.

Inattentive to the misery of others?

People tend to increase their happiness helping others. There is a fine nuance between understanding there is misery in the world we can do nothing about and between knowing that while there is still misery, that what one just did made a difference to someone. That might breed a simpler mindset but also nobler results.

 


 


 

The most pressing social issue today is the economy

Visit Mitt Romney for President, CafeMom Group

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)