Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!

Is "The Jefferson Lies" full of lies? Christian publisher pulls book distribution

Posted by on Aug. 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM
  • 7 Replies

Citing a loss of confidence in the book's details, Christian publisher Thomas Nelson is ending the publication and distribution of the bestseller, The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You've Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson.

Cover art for The Jefferson Lies
Thomas Nelson Publishers

Cover art for The Jefferson Lies

The controversial book was written by Texas evangelical David Barton, who NPR's Barbara Bradley Hagerty profiled on All Things Considered Wednesday. The publishing company says it's ceasing publication because it found that "basic truths just were not there."

Since its initial publication, historians have debunked and raised concerns about numerous claims in Barton's book. In it, Barton calls Jefferson a "conventional Christian," claims the founding father started church services at the Capitol, and even though he owned more than 200 slaves, says Jefferson was a civil rights visionary.

"Mr. Barton is presenting a Jefferson that modern-day evangelicals could love and identify with," Warren Throckmorton, a professor at the evangelical Grove City College, told Hagerty. "The problem with that is, it's not a whole Jefferson; it's not getting him right."

The book's publisher came to the same conclusion.

"When the concerns came in, from multiple people, and that had weight too, we were trying to sort things out," said Thomas Nelson Senior Vice President and Publisher Brian Hampton. "Were these matters of opinion? Were they differences of interpretation? But as we got into it, our conclusion was that the criticisms were correct. There were historical details — matters of fact, not matters of opinion, that were not supported at all."

 

The book has already been pulled off the Thomas Nelson website, and the publisher is in the process of pulling down its availability as an e-book from retail partners. Publishing rights are being reverted to the author, and the physical copies of the book are in the process of being removed from bookstores.

"The truth is, the withdrawing a book from the market is extremely rare. It's so rare I can't think of the last time we've done this," Hampton said. But, he said, "If there are matters of fact not correctly handled or the basic truth is not there, we would make a decision based on that."

We've reached out to Barton for reaction and will update when we hear from him. WORLDmag.com's Thomas Kidd reports:

"Barton told me that he regards Thomas Nelson's decision as a 'strange scenario.' He added that the press has not tried to engage him about the ostensible problems in the book, and that Thomas Nelson officials simply notified him by email that they were stopping publication."

This decision doesn't leave Barton without a publisher, however. Barton's own organization, WallBuilders, published his previous books.

Nice Widdle Puppy


Posted by on Aug. 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies:
imamomzilla
by on Aug. 10, 2012 at 9:14 AM

IDK. First Amendment Rights violation??? My guess is the publisher caved in to the militant atheist bullies.

shimamab
by on Aug. 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM
Unless there's some kind of breach of contract by them pulling the books, it's within their rights to do so. They aren't restricting his 1st amend rights, they just don't want to publish and be associated with a book that has demonstrably false information presented as fact.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
imamomzilla
by on Aug. 10, 2012 at 9:28 AM

 By that reasoning, Obama's book should be pulled too. :-)

Quoting shimamab:

Unless there's some kind of breach of contract by them pulling the books, it's within their rights to do so. They aren't restricting his 1st amend rights, they just don't want to publish and be associated with a book that has demonstrably false information presented as fact.

 

UpSheRises
by Bronze Member on Aug. 10, 2012 at 9:34 AM


Quoting imamomzilla:

IDK. First Amendment Rights violation??? My guess is the publisher caved in to the militant atheist bullies.

A publishing company isn't required by the Constitution to publish books. What planet are you one? The CHRISTIAN publisher was embarrassedto have such a useless piece of crap published under it's title. They only publish christian themed books...so FAIL on the militant atheist theory.

FAIL again because this has been in the news with a bunch bazillion historians and christians debunking almost every claim in the book.   

I know you didn't read the article but you missed the fact that all of this dudes other books were self published, which means he couldn't get a publisher to pick them up either. That means nobody wants to publish his books because he's and idiot.

imamomzilla
by on Aug. 10, 2012 at 10:08 AM

 Aw gee. Did I stike a chord with you? So sawry.

I guess the publisher should have proof read it first. *shrugs How does one debunk the thoughts of a dead President? hmm

Your reply and knee jerk reaction is a typical, perfect example of an oh-so-tolerant, open-minded, loving person. ::sarcasm

God bless.

have a nice day

Quoting UpSheRises:

 

Quoting imamomzilla:

IDK. First Amendment Rights violation??? My guess is the publisher caved in to the militant atheist bullies.

A publishing company isn't required by the Constitution to publish books. What planet are you one? The CHRISTIAN publisher was embarrassedto have such a useless piece of crap published under it's title. They only publish christian themed books...so FAIL on the militant atheist theory.

FAIL again because this has been in the news with a bunch bazillion historians and christians debunking almost every claim in the book.   

I know you didn't read the article but you missed the fact that all of this dudes other books were self published, which means he couldn't get a publisher to pick them up either. That means nobody wants to publish his books because he's and idiot.

 




 "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so". ~Ronald Reagan

shimamab
by on Aug. 10, 2012 at 10:34 AM
1 mom liked this
He said there were composites in his book and his life experiences as seen by him aren't being presented as historical facts. That being said, his publisher has the right to pull his book, too if they want
Quoting imamomzilla:

 By that reasoning, Obama's book should be pulled too. :-)


Quoting shimamab:

Unless there's some kind of breach of contract by them pulling the books, it's within their rights to do so. They aren't restricting his 1st amend rights, they just don't want to publish and be associated with a book that has demonstrably false information presented as fact.

 

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
JakeandEmmasMom
by Gold Member on Aug. 10, 2012 at 12:11 PM
1 mom liked this

 I applaud the integrity of Thomas Nelson in pulling the book.  However, they should have fact-checked it to begin with, IMO. 

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!