Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

Paul Ryan and Todd Akin Partnered On Radical ‘Personhood’ Bill Outlawing Abortion And Many Birth Control Pills

Pema_Jampa
Report
Aicha
Yesterday at 7:04 PM
Khaled, Taha, Faudel - Aicha - Live HD

Live Concert - 1,2,3 Soleils - 1998 ***Warning*** The last person who copied/stole this video to his account was reported and YT removed his copy of this video.

Posted by on Aug. 20, 2012 at 6:54 PM
  • 4 Replies

Paul Ryan and Todd Akin Partnered On Radical ‘Personhood’ Bill Outlawing Abortion And Many Birth Control Pills

From left, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) with Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO)

Yesterday, ThinkProgress reported that Rep. Todd “Legitimate Rape” Akin (R-MO) and GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan both cosponsored the bill that introduced America to the despicable term “forcible rape.” As it turns out, this may only be the second most sweeping attack on reproductive freedom that both men partnered on. Ryan and Akin also cosponsored a federal personhood bill, the Sanctity of Human Life Act of 2009, which declares that a fertilized egg is entitled to the exact same legal rights as a human being:

(1) the Congress declares that–

(A) the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being, and is the paramount and most fundamental right of a person; and

(B) the life of each human being begins with fertilization, cloning, or its functional equivalent, irrespective of sex, health, function or disability, defect, stage of biological development, or condition of dependency, at which time every human being shall have all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood; and

(2) the Congress affirms that the Congress, each State, the District of Columbia, and all United States territories have the authority to protect the lives of all human beings residing in its respective jurisdictions.

Lest there be any doubt, this bill is unconstitutional. Congress does not have the power to overrule Roe v. Wade by an ordinary statue, only a constitutional amendment could serve that purpose. Moreover, even if Roe were overruled by the Supreme Court, Ryan and Akin’s bill still attempts to redefine who “the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution” applies to. Again, changing the meaning of the Constitution can only be done through an amendment, not through an ordinary Act of Congress.

Should Ryan and Akin’s personhood agenda take effect, however, it would drastically reduce women’s reproductive choice. The bill declares that a human egg obtains “all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood” the moment it merges with a human sperm. Thus, a Blastocyst-American would not only enjoy the same constitutional status as a fully grown adult, it would also enjoy any “legal” attributes enjoyed by adults. Because every states’ law makes it a crime to kill a human adult, the likely effect of Ryan and Akin’s personhood bill would be to treat killing a fertilized egg as the same thing as homicide.

Such an interpretation would not simply ban abortion, it could turn many forms of birth control into the legal equivalent of a murder weapon. Many forms of contraception, including many birth control pills, function in part by inhibiting a fertilized egg from implanting in a woman’s uterus. Thus, Ryan and Akin’s personhood bill could render the act of using many forms of oral contraception the equivalent of a homicide crime.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/08/20/712501/paul-ryan-and-todd-akin-partnered-on-radical-personhood-bill-outlawing-abortion-and-many-birth-control-pills/

by on Aug. 20, 2012 at 6:54 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-4):
momof31995
by Bronze Member on Aug. 20, 2012 at 7:32 PM
Again why should Taxpayers pay for Abortions or birth control. If you can't afford either carry the baby to term and give it up for adoption to people who desperately want a baby. If you can't do that then suck it up and raise the baby. There are other options if you can't afford the others. Don't burden taxpayers with your personal choices. If i have to pay for someone else's choices then i should have a say in them.
JakeandEmmasMom
by Gold Member on Aug. 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM
1 mom liked this
Game over.

There is now nothing that could convince me to vote for the Romney/Ryan ticket.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
JakeandEmmasMom
by Gold Member on Aug. 20, 2012 at 7:47 PM
Did you read the article? It doesn't have anything to do with taxpayer funding of anything.

Quoting momof31995:

Again why should Taxpayers pay for Abortions or birth control. If you can't afford either carry the baby to term and give it up for adoption to people who desperately want a baby. If you can't do that then suck it up and raise the baby. There are other options if you can't afford the others. Don't burden taxpayers with your personal choices. If i have to pay for someone else's choices then i should have a say in them.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
NWP
by Guerilla Girl on Aug. 20, 2012 at 9:16 PM

Where are the folks defending these idiots? 

Crickets.......

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)