Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Federal Reserve leaning toward more stimulus

Posted by on Aug. 22, 2012 at 8:22 PM
  • 19 Replies

 http://ca.news.yahoo.com/federal-leaning-toward-more-stimulus-180827376.html

Policy makers at the US Federal Reserve are leaning toward more stimulus action "fairly soon" unless economic data turns around, minutes from their meeting three weeks ago showed Wednesday.

The minutes revealed most members of the Federal Open Market Committee were concerned about slowing growth and the vulnerability of the economy to external threats, particularly economic instability in Europe.

"Many members judged that additional monetary accommodation would likely be warranted fairly soon unless incoming information pointed to a substantial and sustainable strengthening in the pace of the economic recovery," the record of the July 31-August 1 FOMC meeting said.

"A number of members noted that if the recent modest rate of economic growth were to persist, the economy would be less able to weather a material adverse shock without slipping back into recession," it added.

Fed members discussed the merits of different approaches to sparking more drive in the economy, from signalling that they would keep their benchmark interest rate at the current all-time low longer than currently understood, to undertaking more bond purchases aimed at pulling long-term interest rates down further.

Some said that a new Fed program to purchase Treasury and other bonds, pressing down their yields, "might boost business and consumer confidence", while demonstrating that the committee remains focused on lowering unemployment while keeping inflation under control.

In the end, the FOMC put off any new action, but the minutes show the policy makers closer to moving on a new stimulus plan at their next meeting on September 12-13.

Since the beginning of August, indicators of the health of the US economy -- manufacturing production, consumer spending, home prices, and others -- have remained mixed, with economists keeping their estimates of the current pace of economic growth at around 1.9-2.0 percent.

At that pace, the FOMC members were also worried about the economy's ability to withstand shocks.

"Many participants judged that a high level of uncertainty about possible spillovers from the fiscal and banking strains in the euro area" was holding up business and household spending, the minutes said.

"And they saw the possibilities of an intensification of strains in the euro area and of a sharper-than-anticipated US fiscal consolidation as significant downside risks to the economic outlook."

Although the Fed officials mostly agreed that the US financial and business sector had grown more resilient since the 2008-2009 crisis, "some were concerned that at its current pace, the recovery was still vulnerable to adverse shocks."

Economist Michael Gregory at BMO Capital Markets said that, based on the wording of the minutes -- especially the lack of a near-unanimous view of the situation -- he doubted the Fed was ready to launch a new bond-buying program.

Instead, the next move would more likely be an adjustment in their communications of their bearish economic view and their policy aims and intentions in September, as a way of pressing interest rates lower.

Even so, he said, "September's likely easing action is unlikely to be the Fed's last."

The dollar fell against the euro while US interest rates fell sharply after the release of the FOMC minutes. At 1900 GMT the euro was at $1.2530, up from $1.2443 earlier in the day. The yield on the 30-year US Treasury bond dropped 0.8 percentage point to 2.83 percent.

US stocks meanwhile got a boost from the announcement after trading in negative territory for most of the day. The S&P 500 was up about 0.2 percent.

Posted by on Aug. 22, 2012 at 8:22 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies:
_Kissy_
by on Aug. 22, 2012 at 8:25 PM
They should of used more money the first time around

This is getting old.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
hhhanna
by Member on Aug. 22, 2012 at 9:51 PM
2 moms liked this

Sure, why not?  I mean it worked SO well last time.  However, I'm not sure who is going to write it this time.

Should have stuck with the original stimulus package

jcrew6
by Jenney on Aug. 22, 2012 at 10:10 PM
1 mom liked this
Quoting _Kissy_:They should of used more money the first time around

This is getting old.



Well, the money tree wasn't growing fast enough. Even if we end the wars, which Obama isn't. Even if we tax those considered rich by democrats, we still couldn't stimulate democrats entitlements packages. Then add to it, Obama undid Clinton's entitlement reform.
Obama's special interest padding, overseas supporting, non reform policies have contributed to the screwing of America's economic future.
jcrew6
by Jenney on Aug. 22, 2012 at 10:14 PM
1 mom liked this
I remember a post not too long ago about the suicide rate in the army. I would be curious to see if the increased work demands due to the reduction in force as mandated by the federal government cold be seen as a correlation to the suicide rates. They are deploying longer than the Obama admin promised back in 2009. They working longer hours because they aren't manned at same levels. I wish I had the private funds to do such a study.

Hit reply too fast.. So, I wonder if the money politicians claimed to save in cutting the defense budget has paid off they way they wanted. Oh and they want to cut more?
_Kissy_
by on Aug. 22, 2012 at 10:15 PM
You could switch that with the Republican president and Republican voting and still get the same outcome.

Quoting jcrew6:

Quoting _Kissy_:They should of used more money the first time around



This is getting old.






Well, the money tree wasn't growing fast enough. Even if we end the wars, which Obama isn't. Even if we tax those considered rich by democrats, we still couldn't stimulate democrats entitlements packages. Then add to it, Obama undid Clinton's entitlement reform.

Obama's special interest padding, overseas supporting, non reform policies have contributed to the screwing of America's economic future.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
jcrew6
by Jenney on Aug. 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM
1 mom liked this
Quoting _Kissy_:




Bush and a democratic controlled house, and even a bipartisan comgress tried a stimulus. Didnt work then. Isn't working now. Obama has vilified businesses and left too many question marks in the future of his policies to encourage a climate of economic growth. Another stimulus would be detrimental.
Mommy_of_Riley
by Just Jess on Aug. 22, 2012 at 10:25 PM
Actually the Army deployments have reduced from 18-24 months to 15-18 months...

It's still long (and too long in my opinion) but they are shortening them.

And the cuts are nothing new. It happens everytime we end a "war" or "military conflict". The current jobs aren't undermanned... They are overmanned...


Quoting jcrew6:

I remember a post not too long ago about the suicide rate in the army. I would be curious to see if the increased work demands due to the reduction in force as mandated by the federal government cold be seen as a correlation to the suicide rates. They are deploying longer than the Obama admin promised back in 2009. They working longer hours because they aren't manned at same levels. I wish I had the private funds to do such a study.



Hit reply too fast.. So, I wonder if the money politicians claimed to save in cutting the defense budget has paid off they way they wanted. Oh and they want to cut more?
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Mommy_of_Riley
by Just Jess on Aug. 22, 2012 at 10:26 PM
I always wonder where they pull this "stimulus" money from if we are Broke as a country...

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
jcrew6
by Jenney on Aug. 22, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Quoting Mommy_of_Riley:




There is a study that shows many military leaders have been unable to comply with a new uniform standard to deployments because of manning shortages ( due to budget constraints). I will try and find that study and post it. However, I think it was in an actual publication. Will have to see if they have an online site.
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)