Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

Congressional Lawmakers Introduce Legislation To Halt Federal Interference In State Marijuana Laws

Posted by on Nov. 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM
  • 7 Replies

United States Representatives have introduced bipartisan legislation in Congress — House Bill 6606, The Respect States’ and Citizens’ Rights Act of 2012 — to amend the US Controlled Substances Act to provide that federal law shall not preempt state marijuana laws.

The measure is sponsored by Rep. Diana DeGette of Colorado, and is co-sponsored by Reps. Blumenauer (OR), Coffman (CO), Cohen (TN), Farr (CA), Frank (MA), Grijalva (AZ), Lee (CA), Paul (TX), and Polis (CO). It has been referred to Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

“I am proud to join with colleagues from both sides of the aisle on the ‘Respect States’ and Citizens’ Rights Act’ to protect states’ rights and immediately resolve any conflict with the federal government,” said Rep. DeGette in a prepared statement. “In Colorado we’ve witnessed the aggressive policies of the federal government in their treatment of legal medicinal marijuana providers. My constituents have spoken and I don’t want the federal government denying money to Colorado or taking other punitive steps that would undermine the will of our citizens.”

Added Rep. Polis, “The people of Colorado and Washington voted in overwhelming numbers to regulate the sale of marijuana. Colorado officials and law enforcement are already working to implement the will of Colorado voters, and I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues in Congress and officials in the administration to deliver clear guidance that ensures the will of the people is protected.”

House Bill 6606 states, “In the case of any State law that pertains to marihuana, no provision of this title shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy the field in which that provision operates, including criminal penalties, to the exclusion of State law on the same subject matter, nor shall any provision of this title be construed as preempting any such State law.”

While it is unlikely that members of Congress will address this measure in the final days of the 112th session, it is anticipated that Representatives will reintroduce the measure in 2013.

Please visit NORML’s ‘Take Action’ page for updates on contacting your members of Congress regarding The Respect States’ and Citizens’ Rights Act of 2012.



CLICK HERE TO WRITE YOUR REPRESENTATIVE TODAY!

Please contact your rep to support states rights.


Church of The Invisible Pink Unicorn (blessed be her holy hooves)

by on Nov. 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-7):
Kate_Momof3
by Platinum Member on Nov. 30, 2012 at 2:49 PM

 Thanks for the info, Friday. What a waste of time and resources.

Friday
by Platinum Member on Nov. 30, 2012 at 5:11 PM


Quoting Kate_Momof3:

 Thanks for the info, Friday. What a waste of time and resources.

At your service. I hope they can get this thru.


Church of The Invisible Pink Unicorn (blessed be her holy hooves)

Kate_Momof3
by Platinum Member on Nov. 30, 2012 at 5:19 PM

 Fiscal conservatives should be all over this.

Quoting Friday:


Quoting Kate_Momof3:

 Thanks for the info, Friday. What a waste of time and resources.

At your service. I hope they can get this thru.

 

Friday
by Platinum Member on Nov. 30, 2012 at 5:29 PM


Quoting Kate_Momof3:

 Fiscal conservatives should be all over this.

Quoting Friday:


Quoting Kate_Momof3:

 Thanks for the info, Friday. What a waste of time and resources.

At your service. I hope they can get this thru.

 

I would think real Conservatives would support this between states rights, which they claim to support, and fiscal issues.


Church of The Invisible Pink Unicorn (blessed be her holy hooves)

itsmesteph11
by Silver Member on Nov. 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM

 I agree with states rights but this is already a federal law. A permanant change needs to be made not some go around gobbledygook such as this.  

Friday
by Platinum Member on Nov. 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM


Quoting itsmesteph11:

 I agree with states rights but this is already a federal law. A permanant change needs to be made not some go around gobbledygook such as this.  

I agree, mj needs to be reclassified and the drug war ended but this is a start. At least some in DC are seeing how ridiculous this whole thing is.


Church of The Invisible Pink Unicorn (blessed be her holy hooves)

Friday
by Platinum Member on Dec. 6, 2012 at 9:39 PM
1 mom liked this

It's a damn shame that more 'Conservatives' here don't support states rights.


Church of The Invisible Pink Unicorn (blessed be her holy hooves)

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)