Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

CONGRESS ACCUSED OF SNEAKING UNRELATED ‘PORK’ SPENDING INTO SANDY EMERGENCY AID BILL: ‘IT’S TYPICAL OF WASHINGTON’

Posted by on Dec. 29, 2012 at 4:12 PM
  • 7 Replies
1 mom liked this

CONGRESS ACCUSED OF SNEAKING UNRELATED ‘PORK’ SPENDING INTO SANDY EMERGENCY AID BILL: ‘IT’S TYPICAL OF WASHINGTON’

American Majority Action Spokesman Ron Meyer Says Sandy Aid Bill Packed With Pork Spending

New York Senators Charles Schumer (L) and Kirsten Gillibrand brief the media on a bipartisan Hurricane Sandy relief bill voted on December 28, 2012 on Capitol Hill. Credit: AFP/Getty Images

The Senate approved a $60.4 billion recovery package on Friday intended to help the states affected by Hurricane Sandy in November. Appearing on “Cavuto” on Friday night, American Majority Action spokesman Ron Meyer said the bill was also packed with tons of “pork” spending, some of which won’t even occur until after 2013.

Some of the pork spending reportedly goes towards projects that have nothing to do with Hurricane Sandy or the victims, including millions of dollars for tree planting in areas untouched by Sandy and a new roof for the Smithsonian Museum. When an elected representative appropriates government spending for local projects to help his or her district, it is know as “pork barrel” spending.

“Why was this in the emergency bill for Sandy? It doesn’t make any sense.” Only $1 out of every $6 — $9 billion of the $60 billion will be spent in 2013. That means 85 percent doesn’t come until 2014 and beyond. That’s not immediate relief. What this bill is fundamentally is a pork bill.”

Instead, Meyer suggested the Senate should’ve passed a $9 billion “loan” to the states affected by Sandy instead of sneaking in all the wasteful spending before the end of the year.

“It’s disgraceful to load a bill like this that has good motives, that has good intentions that is going to help people, with pork,” he added. “Why are you putting your own projects in it. It’s disgraceful. It’s typical of Washington.”

In an email to TheBlaze, Meyer explained that $1 out of every $20 spent in the Sandy bill will go to “non-relief-related pork.

by on Dec. 29, 2012 at 4:12 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-7):
gsprofval
by Gold Member on Dec. 29, 2012 at 11:24 PM

bump

blues_pagan
by on Dec. 30, 2012 at 1:17 AM
1 mom liked this

I think it is time that we look into amending the Constitution or creating a law that outright forbids this "pork" spending.

_Kissy_
by on Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:17 AM
Where's the link to the actual bill?
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
gsprofval
by Gold Member on Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:35 AM
2 moms liked this

This kind of crap is why there is a deficit, but Congress just keeps spending and spending on stupid stuff:

"Some of the pork spending reportedly goes towards projects that have nothing to do with Hurricane Sandy or the victims, including millions of dollars for tree planting in areas untouched by Sandy and a new roof for the Smithsonian Museum."

Ednarooni160
by Eds on Dec. 30, 2012 at 9:54 AM
1 mom liked this

I read this..and it's been happening in a "lot" of things..getting other things pushed through by way of something else...sort of speak.. I wonder if this government will "ever" change..

imamomzilla
by on Dec. 30, 2012 at 9:58 AM

 I think it was sneaky and disgusting. Those folks need assistance and this just delays it!

gsprofval
by Gold Member on Dec. 30, 2012 at 10:03 AM

Congress should be forced to live on the street or in half a house with no heat, electricity, no gas, no hot food, and no water, no cell phone, no computer, no nothing to see how it feels.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN