Providing health care to younger people offers ‚Äúbetter value‚ÄĚ since the elderly are ‚Äúnot going to live very long anyway,‚ÄĚ contended a blogger for the liberal Slate magazine.
Prior to joining Slate in 2011, Matthew Yglesias was a fellow at the Center for American Progress, which is deeply tied to the White House and has been heavily influential in informing Obama administration policy.
Yglesias authored a blog posting on Monday titled ‚ÄúThe Case For Death Panels, In One Chart.‚ÄĚ
Yglesias‚Äô piece was based on a graph that purported to show how American per capita health care spending goes from marginally higher than Germany or Sweden to much higher. The graphs show the vast majority of the spending increase takes place when Americans reach their late 60s with the costs being shifted to the public sector under Medicare.
That same day, Yglesias posted a correction to his blog piece, admitting the graph he used was ‚Äúbadly flawed.‚ÄĚ
Still, his article goes on to make the case for rationing public health care for the elderly.
Writes Yglesias: ‚ÄúOn the one hand, older people have more need for health care services which militates in favor of allocating spending to them. On the other hand, providing health care services to younger people generally offers better value in terms of years of life and quality of life saved.