Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

FACEBOOK TEMPORARILY SUSPENDS TEA PARTY MOM

Posted by on Feb. 12, 2013 at 4:23 PM
  • 48 Replies


 

In at least the second such encounter in recent weeks, the social media website Facebook has run into issues with conservatives posting information that has caused the site to block Tea Partiers from posting--at least temporarily.

Now, Facebook blocked two stay-at-home Tea Party moms from posting material that’s pro-conservative and critical of liberals including President Barack Obama, Breitbart News has learned. The two moms--Patty and Lisa (they requested Breitbart News not use their last names, as they have “received death threats on our page and would prefer to remain somewhat anonymous”)--have had some issues with regard to posting materials that have gotten caught up in Facebook’s web, starting as early as October 2012.

Then, Patty posted a Breitbart News article, and the photograph contained within the article, on their “100 Percent FED Up” page. The article and photograph were about Rapper Snoop Dogg, and how he tweeted out a picture of a handwritten note containing reasons why somebody should vote for President Barack Obama for re-election. 

Merely posting that article from Breitbart News and the photograph with it--with no editorial commentary of her own--earned Patty a three-day block from posting any content on Facebook. Official warnings popped up on her screen advising her that she violated Facebook’s “Community Standards.”

A few months later, Patty posted a photograph of Adolf Hitler bearing the text: “Never forget what this tyrant said: 'To conquer a nation first disarm its citizens.' - Adolf Hitler." Hitler actually said that, but Patty was blocked then for seven days (she ended up getting it reduced to approximately five days by contacting support) from Facebook.

Then, Wednesday evening this week, Patty posted the home address and contact information of Gracia C. Martore, the president and CEO of Gannett. Gannett publishes the Journal News newspaper in New York that recently printed a list of firearms owners’ personal information. Facebook blocked Patty for 30 days, as of Wednesday night, for that post. 

As of late Thursday, she remained blocked and could not post anything on Facebook except for private messages.

But Facebook spokesman Fred Wolens told Breitbart News what happened was a mistake on the social media company’s part, and the company plans to fix the issue as fast as they can. With regard to the first two instances--the Snoop Dogg story and the Hitler photo--Wolens told Breitbart News that his team couldn’t find specific records of those blocks. “While we couldn't find the photos from the first two examples, if they were posted as described, they would not violate our policies,” Wolens said.

With the Gannett CEO photo information, Wolens said Facebook found the example and has determined that block to be a mistake. “[That] block was a mistake on our part, and we will follow up with our User Operations team to make sure this does not happen again,” Wolens said. “Additionally, we will reach out to the Page admins to communicate this error.”

Wolens added that “these actions are not politically motivated in any way.”

“Please keep in mind to protect the millions of people who connect and share on Facebook every day, we have technical systems that work in the background to maintain a trusted environment and protect our users from bad actors who try to use Facebook to spread spam and malware,” Wolens said in an email. “These systems are so effective that most people who use our site will never encounter spam. They're not perfect, though, and in rare instances they make mistakes. Rarely, posts can be flagged as potentially abusive due to a false positive in our spam classifier, but we investigate the necessary adjustments to our system to make sure we don't repeat the same mistake in the future.”

Just a few weeks ago, the women who run the Chicks on the Right blog had similar problems. Their issues were resolved fairly quickly, and it appears these Tea Party moms’ issues will be resolved soon. 

Patty and Lisa launched their Facebook page after Andrew Breitbart, the founder of this website, passed away.

“Lisa, a friend of mine, and I started this Facebook page 10 months ago and just yesterday we reached 125,000 ‘likes,’” Patty said in a phone interview with Breitbart News. “Our page has exploded kind of quickly, and I think a major reason for that is because everything we do is in memory of Andrew Breitbart--who we met just days before he died.”

Patty said she and Lisa were devastated when Breitbart passed away, and they felt like they had to do something to try to pick up at least some of the slack he left behind. So they started the “100 Percent FED Up” Facebook page from scratch, and it has become a hit. “When the left and the Obama team decided to rename the ‘Occupy’ movement the ’99 percent spring,’ we decided to name the page ‘100 Percent FED Up,’” Patty said. “It’s kind of our way of saying we’re fed up with all the divisiveness that this administration and the left is creating.”

Now more than 125,000 people get Patty’s and Lisa’s posts on their Facebook homepages, and Patty said millions more visit the page every month. August 2012 numbers they provided to Breitbart News show, according to Facebook’s own estimates, these Tea Party moms could reach more than 27 million people in a week.

They constantly update the page, and if they are ever away from their computers for more than a few hours, they’ll get messages from their readers checking to make sure they are okay. “One thing Lisa and I have been careful to do is to not make the movement about us,” Patty said. “It’s always been about telling the truth. I think that’s part of the reason why we’ve been successful.”

by on Feb. 12, 2013 at 4:23 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
rccmom
by Gold Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 4:30 PM

Is there  any right to freedom of speech on a social media outlet like FB? They said it was a mistake, but something in their posts was offensive enough to trigger a FB program to shut them down. 

Pema_Jampa
by 2HotTacoTini on Feb. 12, 2013 at 4:54 PM
2 moms liked this

Not surprised. Wish they'd shut down a few racist tea party people I know. 

SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 4:54 PM
3 moms liked this

They are not the only ones, or even the first ones. The common denominator was that they were conservatives who disagreed with Obama.

Repeated accidental stifling of freedom of speech, as many times as is noted here - just for conservatives? Come on, use your common sense.

chloedee
by Bronze Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 5:04 PM
Quoting SallyMJ:

They are not the only ones, or even the first ones. The common denominator was that they were conservatives who disagreed with Obama.

Repeated accidental stifling of freedom of speech, as many times as is noted here - just for conservatives? Come on, use your common sense.

Is Facebook a forum for unlimited freedom of speech? They have a terms of service and are allowed to block or remove whatever content they'd like.

bluerooffarm
by Silver Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM

 

Quoting SallyMJ:

They are not the only ones, or even the first ones. The common denominator was that they were conservatives who disagreed with Obama.

Repeated accidental stifling of freedom of speech, as many times as is noted here - just for conservatives? Come on, use your common sense.

 While I don't agree with the Snoop dogg one or the Breitbert one, I think they need to manage when someone puts personal info out there for a third party.  I wouldn't want my ex-boyfriend finding my home address, KWIM?  So posting the CEO's home address does cross a line, IMO.

SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 5:30 PM
1 mom liked this

That's what they say anyway - but it seems strange that they would allow profanity and racist speech - but not an alternate political opinion.

That's the strange thing about it. And they are not the only ones, as mentioned in the article.

You are for freedom of speech, right? - when it comes to you and your colleagues.  What about freedom of speech for those who disagree with you?

I'm hoping you are not hypocritical on this. What do you think?

Quoting chloedee:

Quoting SallyMJ:

They are not the only ones, or even the first ones. The common denominator was that they were conservatives who disagreed with Obama.

Repeated accidental stifling of freedom of speech, as many times as is noted here - just for conservatives? Come on, use your common sense.

Is Facebook a forum for unlimited freedom of speech? They have a terms of service and are allowed to block or remove whatever content they'd like.



sweet-a-kins
by Ruby Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 5:32 PM
3 moms liked this
I know some pages that are routinely blocked for language or content

If there are enough complaints and FB thinks the content violates their policy, it's within their right to block people

You don't have a right to Facebook

Conservatives are such cry baby losers that take no responsability for their actions
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 5:32 PM

What Breitbart one?

You are aware that the reason they posted that is because he posted the names and addresses of all the gun owners in the state of New York? Why is one good and the other bad? They sound pretty much the same to me.

Quoting bluerooffarm:

 

Quoting SallyMJ:

They are not the only ones, or even the first ones. The common denominator was that they were conservatives who disagreed with Obama.

Repeated accidental stifling of freedom of speech, as many times as is noted here - just for conservatives? Come on, use your common sense.

 While I don't agree with the Snoop dogg one or the Breitbert one, I think they need to manage when someone puts personal info out there for a third party.  I wouldn't want my ex-boyfriend finding my home address, KWIM?  So posting the CEO's home address does cross a line, IMO.



sweet-a-kins
by Ruby Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 5:34 PM
You are free to say what you want. You are not free of consequences or backlash

We don't know why this woman was blocked, other than these women's words

Like I stated there Are many community pages that get blocked regularly

You have no right to Facebook


Quoting SallyMJ:

That's what they say anyway - but it seems strange that they would allow profanity and racist speech - but not an alternate political opinion.

That's the strange thing about it. And they are not the only ones, as mentioned in the article.

You are for freedom of speech, right? - when it comes to you and your colleagues.  What about freedom of speech for those who disagree with you?

I'm hoping you are not hypocritical on this. What do you think?


Quoting chloedee:


Quoting SallyMJ:

They are not the only ones, or even the first ones. The common denominator was that they were conservatives who disagreed with Obama.

Repeated accidental stifling of freedom of speech, as many times as is noted here - just for conservatives? Come on, use your common sense.

Is Facebook a forum for unlimited freedom of speech? They have a terms of service and are allowed to block or remove whatever content they'd like.





Posted on CafeMom Mobile
SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Feb. 12, 2013 at 5:35 PM
2 moms liked this

So are you saying that a political view does not fall under reasonable free speech? What if the FB founders were conservative? Should they block liberals? Of course not - and they never would. The free speech problem seems to be primarily on the side of liberals/progressives against conservatives. 

And if you are talking about profanity, do you really think conservatives curse more than - even as much as - liberals?  In a word, NO. 

So if you talk about profanity, violence, insurrection - those are the purviews of liberals/progressives, not conservatives

I always thought liberals/progressives defended individuals who are treated unfairly. Is that only if they are liberals? How come not now? Is it because possibly you agree that conservatives should be shut up by government and business?

Just curious.

Quoting sweet-a-kins:

I know some pages that are routinely blocked for language or content

If there are enough complaints and FB thinks the content violates their policy, it's within their right to block people

You don't have a right to Facebook

Conservatives are such cry baby losers that take no responsability for their actions



Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)