Watch out for Petraeus in Benghazi scandal: Second Term Scandals
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Call it â€śOval Office Couch Syndrome.â€ť
By the second term â€śinside the bubble,â€ť presidents have completely lost touch with reality: Aides and confidants conspire to keep the chief executive insulated from the real world â€” the bad news, the worse press coverage. They think itâ€™s their job, and lounging on the Oval Office couches, they nod along with the presidentâ€™s every musing.
But this presidency has taken OOCS to new heights â€” Mr. Obama has only a few trusted aides, and occasional leaks from the West Wing show a paranoid president suspicious of nearly everyone around him. Supremely confident, convinced by the fawning minions at his feet that he is untouchable, the president dismisses all controversy as partisan attacks by an overzealous opposition. A pliant press corps of stenographers follows in lockstep.
Not surprisingly, every president in the past 60 years has had a major scandal in Term Two: Dwight Eisenhower had the U-2 â€śincidentâ€ť; Richard Nixon had Watergate; Ronald Reagan had Iran-Contra; Bill Clinton had Monica (literally); George W. Bush had Katrina (and letâ€™s not forget those WMDs that never turned up); and now, this president hasBenghazi.
For months before, there were warnings about weak security at the U.S. Consulate in Libya; no one paid attention. During the attack, when Americans were begging for help, the White House ignored their pleas, sent no help.
And after? Thatâ€™s when the Obama scandal falls into the predictable second-term pattern his predecessors all learned the very hard way. Faced with a crisis, the Obama White House panicked: â€śWe canâ€™t have a terrorist strike two months before Election Day, so â€¦ letâ€™s not have a terrorist strike two months before Election Day.â€ť Cue the Cover-up.
So little is known about what happened in Benghazi: Where was the commander in chief that night? No pictures from the Situation Room this time. Why didnâ€™t the Pentagon authorize a quick-response team to swoop in? Military members say they were ready â€” burning â€” to go. The call came in: Stand down. Let them die. There were dozens of witnesses to the attack that night: Where are they? What do they know? What really happened that night?
And who forced the heavy-handed redactions of those infamous â€śtalking points,â€ť the ones that sent Mr. Obamaâ€™s ambassador to the United Nations onto the Sunday talk shows to declare that the attack was just the culmination of a spontaneous protest over an anti-Islam video posted on YouTube?
Carnival barker Jay Carney looked almost ashen Friday as he took the podium to face a suddenly invigorated press corps. Of course, the public briefing came after a private session with â€śreporters who matter,â€ť a sure sign the White House is in full hunker-down mode â€” and, more precisely, terrified.
â€śAgain,â€ť one newly curious reporter asked, â€śwhat role did the White House play, not just in making but in directing changes that took place to these?â€ť
â€śWell,â€ť the carney said, â€śthank you for that question. The way to look at this, I think, is to start from that week and understand that in the wake of the attacks in Benghazi, an effort was underway to find out what happened, who was responsible. In response to a request from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence to the CIA, the CIA began a process of developing points that could be used in public by members of Congress, by members of that committee. And that process, as is always the case â€” again, led by the CIA â€” involved input from a variety of â€¦â€ť
Enough. You get the point: Full Spin Cycle.
â€śThat is what was generated by the intelligence community, by the CIA,â€ť he said.
For the record, this is what the CIA â€śgeneratedâ€ť: â€śSince April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants.â€ť That line was stricken: Everything was fine there â€” fine fine fine.
And: â€śWe do know that that Islamic extremists with ties to Al Qaeda participated in the attack.â€ť That line, too, was deleted by â€¦ someone. Instead, this was inserted: â€śThere are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.â€ť
Despite protestations by the White House, this scandal is just beginning. And the White House has picked a very bad scapegoat: the Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA follows RFKâ€™s edict: â€śDonâ€™t get mad, get even.â€ť And when the CIA gets even, it isnâ€™t pretty.
With the White House putting all blame on the agency, expect push back this week â€” nuclear push back. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the former director forced to resign after a sex scandal, is a dangerous man to the Obama administration. Mad and intent on getting even, heâ€™s already talking, telling one reporter the talking points were â€śuselessâ€ť and he preferred not to use them at all. The floodgates will open this week, and by EOB Friday, the scandal will be full blown.
A warning to those West Wing sycophants suffering from acute OOCS: Donâ€™t walk down any dark alleys.