Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

This County Had 124% More Registered Voters Than Eligible Voters....

Posted by on Sep. 7, 2013 at 7:09 PM
  • 59 Replies
2 moms liked this

 This County Had 124% More Registered Voters Than Eligible Voters – Counting Dead People and Felons

 

In the midst of a national debate over voter integrity, a federal court decree is ordering a Mississippi county to purge its voter rolls of dead people, ineligible felons and people who have moved out of a voting area.

In April, the American Civil Rights Union, a conservative legal group, sued Walthall County, Miss., for having 124 percent more registered voters than voting-age-eligible residents, based on U.S. Census data. The lawsuit was filed under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, better known as the Motor Voter law, and is the first privately-brought suit to succeed, according to the ACRU.

“This case should have been called United States v. Walthall County instead of ACRU v. Walthall County,” said J. Christian Adams, a former Justice Department voting section attorney. Adams along with former Justice Department Voting Section chief Christopher Coates and former DOJ attorney Henry Ross filed the lawsuit for the ACRU.

“We’re doing the job that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. won’t do. In fact, he’s too busy suing Texas for its new photo ID law and abusing power in other ways to harass states that are trying to ensure election integrity,” Adams said in a statement.

Walthall County, Miss. is red county in a red state, is majority white, and was carried Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in 2012, according to the Heritage Foundation. This could blunt the argument generally used by Democrats and the Holder Justice Department, that voter integrity measures harm minority voters and benefit Republican candidates.

The ACRU has filed a similar case against Jefferson Davis County in Mississippi, which is still pending. A trial date has been set for June 2014.

The county seat of Walthall County is Tylertown, and it has a population of just over 15,000.

The consent decree approved by U.S. District Judge Keith Starrett of the Southern District of Mississippi requires Walthall County to check its voter registration list against the Social Security Administration and the Mississippi Department of Health to find dead voters; with the state Department of Motor Vehicles records to find voters who have moved out of the county; and with conviction records of the local county court clerk, the Mississippi Department of Corrections, and the Mississippi and Louisiana U.S. attorneys’ offices to find convicted felons no longer eligible to vote; with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database to find non citizens; and with jury-duty declinations and county tax filings to find non citizens and nonresidents.

“This is historic and should have been done 20 years ago,” ACRU Chairman Susan A. Carleson said of the Walthall case. “It’s the first time since Motor Voter was enacted in 1993 giving private parties the right to sue over voting irregularities that any private party has won a case to require clean voter rolls. With the Justice Department on the warpath against state election integrity laws, it couldn’t come at a better time.”

grandma B

by on Sep. 7, 2013 at 7:09 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Sep. 7, 2013 at 8:55 PM
6 moms liked this

Oh come on, GrandmaB125!!!

Liberals tell me that there is virtually ZERO  voter fraud.

I'm trying to figure out whether to believe them or not.

I'm thinking NOT.

When anyplace in the US has MORE registered voters than eligible voters - Houston, we have a problem.

grandmab125
by Platinum Member on Sep. 7, 2013 at 10:11 PM
2 moms liked this

 Yup....just like that county in Ohio in the 2012 election.

Quoting SallyMJ:

Oh come on, GrandmaB125!!!

Liberals tell me that there is virtually ZERO  voter fraud.

I'm trying to figure out whether to believe them or not.

I'm thinking NOT.

When anyplace in the US has MORE registered voters than eligible voters - Houston, we have a problem.

 

grandma B

Ednarooni160
by Eds on Sep. 7, 2013 at 10:13 PM
6 moms liked this

Fraud is so  "rampant" in this country from every angle..from illegals to politicians, to voting to you name it..disgusting is what it is. Good post..

joyfree
by Kat on Sep. 7, 2013 at 10:41 PM
1 mom liked this

Am I missing where there was fraud? 

Pema_Jampa
by 2HotTacoTini on Sep. 7, 2013 at 11:22 PM
1 mom liked this
Obviously you are. Just because they claim it makes it so. Haven't you been following?

Quoting joyfree:

Am I missing where there was fraud? 

joyfree
by Kat on Sep. 7, 2013 at 11:26 PM

I just didn't see a problem in that post--- seemed sort of pointless...

going crazy


Quoting Pema_Jampa:

Obviously you are. Just because they claim it makes it so. Haven't you been following?

Quoting joyfree:

Am I missing where there was fraud? 



SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Sep. 7, 2013 at 11:34 PM
1 mom liked this

Read it again, more slowly. Then look at the numbers, the percentage. And then conclude what that means.

THAT'S the fraud.

It's pretty easy - I'm sure you can figure it out. :)


Quoting joyfree:

I just didn't see a problem in that post--- seemed sort of pointless...

going crazy


Quoting Pema_Jampa:

Obviously you are. Just because they claim it makes it so. Haven't you been following?

Quoting joyfree:

Am I missing where there was fraud? 





Sisteract
by Socialist Hippie on Sep. 7, 2013 at 11:50 PM
1 mom liked this

124%???

BS

joyfree
by Kat on Sep. 7, 2013 at 11:52 PM

I already read it twice--- It says it RIGHT IN THE TITLE, too!

To ME, it's a big deal when someone actually votes fraudulently, NOT that they need to clean up the registration books.

If the clean-up is done correctly, and nobody is deleted wrongly, I don't see a problem.


Quoting SallyMJ:

Read it again, more slowly. Then look at the numbers, the percentage. And then conclude what that means.

THAT'S the fraud.

It's pretty easy - I'm sure you can figure it out. :)


Quoting joyfree:

I just didn't see a problem in that post--- seemed sort of pointless...

going crazy


Quoting Pema_Jampa:

Obviously you are. Just because they claim it makes it so. Haven't you been following?

Quoting joyfree:

Am I missing where there was fraud? 







mowen44
by Member on Sep. 8, 2013 at 5:19 AM
7 moms liked this

The claim is more registered voters, not voters.  So they haven't kept  the register up to date.  That does not mean that there were actually more people who voted than eligible people.  It means a conservative group found a register that was not up to date and made much ado about nothing.  So a register has not purged the dead people as it should.  It does not mean the dead actually voted.  It means in looking over the entire country this is the best they could do on trying to claim voter fraud.  Sour grapes for losing and a poor excuse for attempts they will make in the next election at suppression of the votes of the young, the very old, and the poor.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN