Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Food Stamp Use is Highest in Red States: The Truth Republicans Do Not Want You to Know

Posted by on Sep. 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM
  • 9 Replies

Food stamps are considered a mode of government spending with a high multiplier effect. In other words, when someone is poor and using food stamps (which are now in debit card form) this often triggers more economic activity than it costs. Republicans should find a target for their ire that is less effective at stimulating the economy.  

However, what happens is Republicans take the opposite approach. They believe that giving tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires is the best way to stimulate economic growth. The only problem with that is reality.

Economists say that providing food stamps might be the most stimulative action the government can take. Tax cuts for the wealthy ranks around 12th.  

I'm not against tax cuts for the wealthy out of any disdain for the wealthy. I prefer everyone would keep 100% of his or her money, but I'm not sure our system that helps generate the wealth would continue to operate. So, the question is, do Republican approaches work? Who do they work for?  Do they work long term?

As far as I can tell, Bush was able to stimulate the economy for a while using Republican approaches, but at the end of his time in office it entirely imploded. Reagan, same thing. I think the economy had another collapse right after he left office. So, what about the food stamp issue? Why are Republicans so concerned about it?  

Charts of food stamp usage show that while a few Democrat led states have high food stamp usage; food stamp usage is highest consistently across Republican states. What does that say about the Republican approach?

To me, it says that the top down, trickle down theory of economics fails the poor. Under conditions where the poor were helped, one would expect that there would be less reliance on food stamps. People would receive short-term support, a little assistance getting on their feet, maybe some job training, or some assistance paying for community college and would be on their way.  

If the poor are uplifted even just slightly then they become tax payers rather than living off food stamps. Republicans are angry about food stamp usage because they have failed to uplift the poor in their states. The top down, trickle down, economic approach has broken social mobility in Republican led states. Republicans are angry because their failed economic approach leaves them with fewer tax payers and more people on welfare.

Do you remember the spike in food stamp usage that occurred after the Bush administration? Take a look at a map of food stamp usage and comment below. In many Republican states (and a few Democrat led), food stamp usage is as much as 1/5th of the population. What does this say about the success of Republicans policies in helping the poor and middle class improve their lives?

http://www.policymic.com/articles/14007/food-stamp-use-is-highest-in-red-states-the-truth-republicans-do-not-want-you-to-know

by on Sep. 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-9):
-Celestial-
by Pepperlynn on Sep. 20, 2013 at 11:41 PM

Hope their constituents remember them in 2014 when they go to vote, that they chose the almighty corporate welfare over the American people.

Pema_Jampa
by Celeste on Sep. 20, 2013 at 11:41 PM

We have already discussed this like 50 times. Same old arguments etc. 

banging head into wall

PrimmednPunked
by Silver Member on Sep. 20, 2013 at 11:44 PM

Of course they are.  They are usually the poorest.

-Celestial-
by Pepperlynn on Sep. 20, 2013 at 11:47 PM

True. But with the 40,000,000,000 that was just  cut, and their states being the biggest hit, and all the running to get new iphones instead of running to donate food to local charities. It should be interesting to see how they are gonna contain their people.

Quoting Pema_Jampa:e a wake up call.

We have already discussed this like 50 times. Same old arguments etc. 

banging head into wall


grandmab125
by Gold Member on Sep. 21, 2013 at 12:28 AM
1 mom liked this

 So, you get paid by CM to contstantly post the same things over and over?  Cushy job you have there.

Sisteract
by Socialist Hippie on Sep. 21, 2013 at 12:29 AM

Yep- lots of poor people in the Southern US and bible belt-

mustbeGRACE
by Silver Member on Sep. 21, 2013 at 1:10 AM
1 mom liked this

I have personally debunked this thoroughly at least twice here and will NOT do it even one more time !!!!!!

Whose fault is it that you people just can't remember anything????

myheartbeat
by Member on Sep. 21, 2013 at 12:44 PM

If we cut  aid to all other countries,  and cut  House and Senate pay checks in half, we would be able to care for the weakest among us.

SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Sep. 21, 2013 at 6:47 PM

So what you are saying is that Obama's economic policies and overregulations, like Obamacare, have nothing to do with people losing their jobs and not being able to find fulltime work?

Which forces poor Americans to go on food stamps, in the first place.

OKAY...

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)