Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

Kennedy vs. Reagan vs.Obama

Posted by   + Show Post

by on Oct. 25, 2013 at 5:01 AM
Replies (21-30):
SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Oct. 27, 2013 at 12:21 PM
1 mom liked this

If spending priorities never changed, there would be a line item in the federal budget for taxpayer subsidized buggy whips.

Quoting codfish:

So cutting government is bad how? Obama sut down the entire shuttle program!
Obama had his way the first two years with dems controlling both chambers.
Clinton had rep controlled chambers during most of h is presidency. Funding for nasa was all good.
Bless your heart..


Quoting mommom2000:

Under the other presidents they didn't have to work with a crazy party who wanted only to cut, and obstruct. Anyone paying attention knows what party has been wanting to slash spending on science. The republicans proposed cuts to NASA, they are the party who wanted to cut, cut,cut but refused to even talk about revenue.



Quoting DSamuels:

Let's see, who has defended and pretty much completely dismantled NASA altogether. And gotten rid of the space shuttles, giving them to a few selected museums.

Could it be a DEMOCRAT named Obama?

Nice try! confused


Quoting mommom2000:

if we had the republicans of today, we would have never made it to the moon, they would have cut funding to NASA.





DSamuels
by Gold Member on Oct. 27, 2013 at 12:30 PM

She tries so hard. Too bad the facts usually aren't with her.

Quoting codfish:

So cutting government is bad how? Obama sut down the entire shuttle program!
Obama had his way the first two years with dems controlling both chambers.
Clinton had rep controlled chambers during most of h is presidency. Funding for nasa was all good.
Bless your heart..


Quoting mommom2000:

Under the other presidents they didn't have to work with a crazy party who wanted only to cut, and obstruct. Anyone paying attention knows what party has been wanting to slash spending on science. The republicans proposed cuts to NASA, they are the party who wanted to cut, cut,cut but refused to even talk about revenue.



Quoting DSamuels:

Let's see, who has defended and pretty much completely dismantled NASA altogether. And gotten rid of the space shuttles, giving them to a few selected museums.

Could it be a DEMOCRAT named Obama?

Nice try! confused


Quoting mommom2000:

if we had the republicans of today, we would have never made it to the moon, they would have cut funding to NASA.





JustCJ
by on Oct. 27, 2013 at 12:35 PM
1 mom liked this

umm :/

Quoting mommom2000:

if we had the republicans of today, we would have never made it to the moon, they would have cut funding to NASA.


codfish
by Jen on Oct. 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM
Really? I am just crazy and Obama didn't do massive damage to nasa funding. I forget how much kool-aid some of you have drunk regarding this idiot.

Quoting DSamuels:

She tries so hard. Too bad the facts usually aren't with her.

Quoting codfish:

So cutting government is bad how? Obama sut down the entire shuttle program!

Obama had his way the first two years with dems controlling both chambers.

Clinton had rep controlled chambers during most of h is presidency. Funding for nasa was all good.

Bless your heart..




Quoting mommom2000:

Under the other presidents they didn't have to work with a crazy party who wanted only to cut, and obstruct. Anyone paying attention knows what party has been wanting to slash spending on science. The republicans proposed cuts to NASA, they are the party who wanted to cut, cut,cut but refused to even talk about revenue.






Quoting DSamuels:

Let's see, who has defended and pretty much completely dismantled NASA altogether. And gotten rid of the space shuttles, giving them to a few selected museums.

Could it be a DEMOCRAT named Obama?

Nice try! confused


Quoting mommom2000:

if we had the republicans of today, we would have never made it to the moon, they would have cut funding to NASA.






DSamuels
by Gold Member on Oct. 27, 2013 at 1:10 PM

Huh? I was agreeing with you. My statements were about momom2000, not you.

Quoting codfish:

Really? I am just crazy and Obama didn't do massive damage to nasa funding. I forget how much kool-aid some of you have drunk regarding this idiot.

Quoting DSamuels:

She tries so hard. Too bad the facts usually aren't with her.

Quoting codfish:

So cutting government is bad how? Obama sut down the entire shuttle program!

Obama had his way the first two years with dems controlling both chambers.

Clinton had rep controlled chambers during most of h is presidency. Funding for nasa was all good.

Bless your heart..




Quoting mommom2000:

Under the other presidents they didn't have to work with a crazy party who wanted only to cut, and obstruct. Anyone paying attention knows what party has been wanting to slash spending on science. The republicans proposed cuts to NASA, they are the party who wanted to cut, cut,cut but refused to even talk about revenue.






Quoting DSamuels:

Let's see, who has defended and pretty much completely dismantled NASA altogether. And gotten rid of the space shuttles, giving them to a few selected museums.

Could it be a DEMOCRAT named Obama?

Nice try! confused


Quoting mommom2000:

if we had the republicans of today, we would have never made it to the moon, they would have cut funding to NASA.







mommom2000
by Bronze Member on Oct. 28, 2013 at 8:35 AM
I said the republicans of today, the tea party led republicans, not the republicans of the Clinton years, they were reasonable.
Quoting DSamuels:

Really? So the republicans didn't have control of both the house and senate during 6 years of Clinton's presidency, starting in 1994? Control they kept until 2006. And yet the space program did fine. Go figure. 

Kudos to the republicans....we need to cut spending! 

Quoting mommom2000:

Under the other presidents they didn't have to work with a crazy party who wanted only to cut, and obstruct. Anyone paying attention knows what party has been wanting to slash spending on science. The republicans proposed cuts to NASA, they are the party who wanted to cut, cut,cut but refused to even talk about revenue.
Quoting DSamuels:

Let's see, who has defended and pretty much completely dismantled NASA altogether. And gotten rid of the space shuttles, giving them to a few selected museums.

Could it be a DEMOCRAT named Obama?

Nice try! confused


Quoting mommom2000:

if we had the republicans of today, we would have never made it to the moon, they would have cut funding to NASA.





littlelamb303
by Member on Oct. 28, 2013 at 8:37 AM

Quoting Carpy:

I miss Reagan.

he was very bad for the middle class
Sisteract
by Socialist Hippie on Oct. 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM
Quoting littlelamb303:


Quoting Carpy:

I miss Reagan.

he was very bad for the middle class
Exactly- his policies are directly tied to today's issues[started the decline] in terms of jobs, taxes and outsourcing.
SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Oct. 28, 2013 at 11:11 AM

Except they weren't at all, according to overwhelming economic data.

Reagan's policies helped every socioeconomic demographic of the population. Unlike Obama's. But not politically correct enough for left wing academia or the hip set.

Nice fake.

Quoting Sisteract:

Quoting littlelamb303:


Quoting Carpy:

I miss Reagan.

he was very bad for the middle class
Exactly- his policies are directly tied to today's issues[started the decline] in terms of jobs, taxes and outsourcing.


Carpy
by Platinum Member on Oct. 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM
How so? I think the nineties would disagree.

Quoting littlelamb303:



Quoting Carpy:

I miss Reagan.


he was very bad for the middle class
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)